The Journal of Neuroscience, May 17, 2006, 26(20):5301-5308; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0340-06.2006
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Spatiotemporal Tuning of Rapid Interactions between Visual-Motion Analysis and Reaching Movement
Hiroaki Gomi,1,2
Naotoshi Abekawa,1,3 and
Shinya Nishida1
1NTT Communication Science Laboratories, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation, Atsugi, Kanagawa 243-0198, Japan, 2Shimojo Implicit Brain Function Project, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Atsugi, Kanagawa 243-0198, Japan, and 3Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 226-8502, Japan
Correspondence should be addressed to Hiroaki Gomi, NTT Communication Science Laboratories, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation, Wakamiya 3-1, Morinosato, Atsugi, Kanagawa 243-0198, Japan. Email: gomi{at}idea.brl.ntt.co.jp
In addition to the goal-directed preplanned control, which strongly governs reaching movements, another type of control mechanism is suggested by recent findings that arm movements are rapidly entrained by surrounding visual motion. It remains, however, controversial whether this rapid manual response is generated in a goal-oriented manner similarly to preplanned control or is reflexively and directly induced by visual motion. To investigate the sensorimotor process underlying rapid manual responses induced by large-field visual motion, we examined the effects of contrast and spatiotemporal frequency of the visual-motion stimulus. The manual response amplitude increased steeply with image contrast up to 10% and leveled off thereafter. Regardless of the spatial frequency, the response amplitude increased almost proportionally to the logarithm of stimulus speed until the temporal frequency reached 1520 Hz and then fell off. The maximum response was obtained at the lowest spatial frequency we examined (0.05 cycles/°). These stimulus specificities are surprisingly similar to those of the reflexive ocular-following response induced by visual motion, although there is no direct motor entrainment from the ocular to manual responses. In addition, the spatiotemporal tuning is clearly different from that of perceptual effects caused by visual motion. These comparisons suggest that the rapid manual response is generated by a reflexive sensorimotor mechanism. This mechanism shares a distinctive visual-motion processing stage with the reflexive control for other motor systems yet is distinct from visual-motion perception.
Key words: involuntary visuomotor response; reflexive manual response; large-field visual motion; reaching arm movement; contrast tuning; ocular-following response
Received Sept. 26, 2005;
revised March 16, 2006;
accepted April 4, 2006.
Correspondence should be addressed to Hiroaki Gomi, NTT Communication Science Laboratories, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation, Wakamiya 3-1, Morinosato, Atsugi, Kanagawa 243-0198, Japan. Email: gomi{at}idea.brl.ntt.co.jp
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Whitney, A. Ellison, N. J. Rice, D. Arnold, M. Goodale, V. Walsh, and D. Milner
Visually Guided Reaching Depends on Motion Area MT+
Cereb Cortex,
November 1, 2007;
17(11):
2644 - 2649.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|