WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience PeproTech - Your Source for Neuroscience Research Reagents
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, June 7, 2006, 26(23):6346-6353; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0284-06.2006

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonin, V.
Right arrow Articles by Carandini, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonin, V.
Right arrow Articles by Carandini, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
The Statistical Computation Underlying Contrast Gain Control

Vincent Bonin, Valerio Mante, and Matteo Carandini

The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California 94115

Correspondence should be addressed to Vincent Bonin, The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, 2318 Fillmore Street, San Francisco, CA 94115. Email: vincent{at}ski.org

In the early visual system, a contrast gain control mechanism sets the gain of responses based on the locally prevalent contrast. The measure of contrast used by this adaptation mechanism is commonly assumed to be the standard deviation of light intensities relative to the mean (root-mean-square contrast). A number of alternatives, however, are possible. For example, the measure of contrast might depend on the absolute deviations relative to the mean, or on the prevalence of the darkest or lightest intensities. We investigated the statistical computation underlying this measure of contrast in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus, which relays signals from retina to cortex. Borrowing a method from psychophysics, we recorded responses to white noise stimuli whose distribution of intensities was precisely varied. We varied the standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis of the distribution of intensities while keeping the mean luminance constant. We found that gain strongly depends on the standard deviation of the distribution. At constant standard deviation, moreover, gain is invariant to changes in skewness or kurtosis. These findings held for both ON and OFF cells, indicating that the measure of contrast is independent of the range of stimulus intensities signaled by the cells. These results confirm the long-held assumption that contrast gain control computes root-mean-square contrast. They also show that contrast gain control senses the full distribution of intensities and leaves unvaried the relative responses of the different cell types. The advantages to visual processing of this remarkably specific computation are not entirely known.

Key words: receptive field; adaptation; inhibition; retina; luminance; image statistics; texture


Received Jan. 20, 2006; revised April 18, 2006; accepted May 8, 2006.

Correspondence should be addressed to Vincent Bonin, The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, 2318 Fillmore Street, San Francisco, CA 94115. Email: vincent{at}ski.org




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
C. Weber and J. Triesch
A Sparse Generative Model of V1 Simple Cells with Intrinsic Plasticity
Neural Comput., May 1, 2008; 20(5): 1261 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Diaz-Quesada and M. Maravall
Intrinsic Mechanisms for Adaptive Gain Rescaling in Barrel Cortex
J. Neurosci., January 16, 2008; 28(3): 696 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Duong and R. D. Freeman
Contrast Sensitivity Is Enhanced by Expansive Nonlinear Processing in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 367 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Bandyopadhyay, L. A. J. Reiss, and E. D. Young
Receptive Field for Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Neurons at Multiple Sound Levels
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3505 - 3515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. A. J. Reiss, S. Bandyopadhyay, and E. D. Young
Effects of Stimulus Spectral Contrast on Receptive Fields of Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Neurons
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2133 - 2143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. L. Ringach and B. J. Malone
The Operating Point of the Cortex: Neurons as Large Deviation Detectors
J. Neurosci., July 18, 2007; 27(29): 7673 - 7683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. L. Beaudoin, B. G. Borghuis, and J. B. Demb
Cellular Basis for Contrast Gain Control over the Receptive Field Center of Mammalian Retinal Ganglion Cells
J. Neurosci., March 7, 2007; 27(10): 2636 - 2645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-