 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, August 2, 2006, 26(31):8176-8182; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1641-06.2006
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
The Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus Mediates Grasp Execution, Independent of Requirement to Update: New Insights from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Nichola J. Rice,
Eugene Tunik, and
Scott T. Grafton
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
Correspondence should be addressed to Scott T. Grafton, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, HB 6162 Moore Hall, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755. Email: scott.t.grafton{at}dartmouth.edu
Although a role of the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) in grasping is becoming evident, the specific contribution of regions within the IPS remains undefined. In this vein, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered to the anterior (aIPS), middle (mIPS), and caudal (cIPS) IPS in two tasks designed to dissociate the potential roles of the IPS in either grasp planning or execution (task 1) and its involvement in error detection or error correction (task 2). Determining the involvement of specific regions of the IPS in perceptual (planning and error detection) versus motor (execution and correction) components of grasping allowed us to assess the ecological validity of competing computational models attempting to simulate reach-to-grasp movements. In task 1, we demonstrate that, when no on-line adjustment is necessary, TMS to aIPS (but not mIPS or cIPS) disrupts grasping; this disruption is only elicited when TMS is applied during the execution (but not the planning) phase of the movement. Task 2 reveals that TMS to aIPS (but not mIPS or cIPS) disrupts grasping in the presence of a perturbation; this disruption is only elicited when TMS is applied during the error correction (but not error detection) phase of the movement. We propose that the specific contribution of the aIPS in grasping is in the on-line computation of a difference vector based on motor goal, efference copy, and sensory inputs. This computation is performed for both stable and perturbed motor goals.
Key words: motor control; grasping; intraparietal sulcus; dorsal stream; computational models; perception and action
Received April 17, 2006;
revised July 3, 2006;
accepted July 5, 2006.
Correspondence should be addressed to Scott T. Grafton, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, HB 6162 Moore Hall, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755. Email: scott.t.grafton{at}dartmouth.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Gosselin-Kessiby, J. F. Kalaska, and J. Messier
Evidence for a Proprioception-Based Rapid On-Line Error Correction Mechanism for Hand Orientation during Reaching Movements in Blind Subjects
J. Neurosci.,
March 18, 2009;
29(11):
3485 - 3496.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Tunik, O.-Y. Lo, and S. V. Adamovich
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Frontal Operculum and Supramarginal Gyrus Disrupts Planning of Outcome-Based Hand-Object Interactions
J. Neurosci.,
December 31, 2008;
28(53):
14422 - 14427.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Tunik, S. Ortigue, S. V. Adamovich, and S. T. Grafton
Differential Recruitment of Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus and Superior Parietal Lobule during Visually Guided Grasping Revealed by Electrical Neuroimaging
J. Neurosci.,
December 10, 2008;
28(50):
13615 - 13620.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Vesia, X. Yan, D. Y. Henriques, L. E. Sergio, and J. D. Crawford
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over Human Dorsal-Lateral Posterior Parietal Cortex Disrupts Integration of Hand Position Signals Into the Reach Plan
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2008;
100(4):
2005 - 2014.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Koch, M. F. Del Olmo, B. Cheeran, S. Schippling, C. Caltagirone, J. Driver, and J. C. Rothwell
Functional Interplay between Posterior Parietal and Ipsilateral Motor Cortex Revealed by Twin-Coil Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during Reach Planning toward Contralateral Space
J. Neurosci.,
June 4, 2008;
28(23):
5944 - 5953.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Gosselin-Kessiby, J. Messier, and J. F. Kalaska
Evidence for Automatic On-Line Adjustments of Hand Orientation During Natural Reaching Movements to Stationary Targets
J Neurophysiol,
April 1, 2008;
99(4):
1653 - 1671.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Castiello and C. Begliomini
The Cortical Control of Visually Guided Grasping
Neuroscientist,
April 1, 2008;
14(2):
157 - 170.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Fiehler, M. Burke, A. Engel, S. Bien, and F. Rosler
Kinesthetic Working Memory and Action Control within the Dorsal Stream
Cereb Cortex,
February 1, 2008;
18(2):
243 - 253.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. P. Gardner, K. S. Babu, S. Ghosh, A. Sherwood, and J. Chen
Neurophysiology of Prehension. III. Representation of Object Features in Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 2007;
98(6):
3708 - 3730.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Grol, J. Majdandzic, K. E. Stephan, L. Verhagen, H. C. Dijkerman, H. Bekkering, F. A. J. Verstraten, and I. Toni
Parieto-Frontal Connectivity during Visually Guided Grasping
J. Neurosci.,
October 31, 2007;
27(44):
11877 - 11887.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|