QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, September 13, 2006, 26(37):9538-9547; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0918-06.2006

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (23) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Derdikman, D. Articles by Ahissar, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Derdikman, D. Articles by Ahissar, E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Layer-Specific Touch-Dependent Facilitation and Depression in the Somatosensory Cortex during Active Whisking

Dori Derdikman, Chunxiu Yu, Sebastian Haidarliu, Knarik Bagdasarian, Amos Arieli, and Ehud Ahissar

Department of Neurobiology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel

Correspondence should be addressed to Ehud Ahissar, Department of Neurobiology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. Email: Ehud.Ahissar{at}weizmann.ac.il

Brains adapt to new situations by retuning their neurons. The most common form of neuronal adaptation, typically observed with repetitive stimulations of passive sensory organs, is depression (responses gradually decrease until stabilized). We studied cortical adaptation when stimuli are acquired by active movements of the sensory organ. In anesthetized rats, artificial whisking was induced at 5 Hz, and activity of individual neurons in layers 2–5 was recorded during whisking in air (Whisking condition) and whisking against an object (Touch condition). Response strengths were assessed by spike counts. Input-layer responses (layers 4 and 5a) usually facilitated during the whisking train, whereas superficial responses (layer 2/3) usually depressed. In layers 2/3 and 4, but not 5a, responses were usually stronger during touch trials than during whisking in air. Facilitations were specific to the protraction phase; during retraction, responses depressed in all layers and conditions. These dynamic processes were accompanied by a slow positive wave of activity progressing from superficial to deeper layers and lasting for 1 s, during the transient phase of response. Our results indicate that, in the cortex, adaptation does not depend only on the level of activity or the frequency of its repetition but rather on the nature of the sensory information that is conveyed by that activity and on the processing layer. The input and laminar specificities observed here are consistent with the hypothesis that the paralemniscal layer 5a is involved in the processing of whisker motion, whereas the lemniscal barrels in layer 4 are involved in the processing of object identity.

Key words: active touch; adaptation; lemniscal; paralemniscal; barrels; whisker

---

Received March 1, 2006; revised Aug. 3, 2006; accepted Aug. 3, 2006.

Correspondence should be addressed to Ehud Ahissar, Department of Neurobiology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. Email: Ehud.Ahissar{at}weizmann.ac.il

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. P. J. de Kock and B. Sakmann Spiking in primary somatosensory cortex during natural whisking in awake head-restrained rats is cell-type specific PNAS, September 22, 2009; 106(38): 16446 - 16450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Hildebrandt, J. Benda, and R. M. Hennig The Origin of Adaptation in the Auditory Pathway of Locusts Is Specific to Cell Type and Function J. Neurosci., February 25, 2009; 29(8): 2626 - 2636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Heiss, Y. Katz, E. Ganmor, and I. Lampl Shift in the Balance between Excitation and Inhibition during Sensory Adaptation of S1 Neurons J. Neurosci., December 3, 2008; 28(49): 13320 - 13330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. de Celis Alonso, A. S. Lowe, J. P. Dear, K. C. Lee, S. C. R. Williams, and G. T. Finnerty Sensory Inputs from Whisking Movements Modify Cortical Whisker Maps Visualized with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2008; 18(6): 1314 - 1325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Alloway Information Processing Streams in Rodent Barrel Cortex: The Differential Functions of Barrel and Septal Circuits Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 979 - 989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Lak, E. Arabzadeh, and M. E. Diamond Enhanced Response of Neurons in Rat Somatosensory Cortex to Stimuli Containing Temporal Noise Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 1085 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Diaz-Quesada and M. Maravall Intrinsic Mechanisms for Adaptive Gain Rescaling in Barrel Cortex J. Neurosci., January 16, 2008; 28(3): 696 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Schubert Observing without disturbing: how different cortical neuron classes represent tactile stimuli J. Physiol., May 15, 2007; 581(1): 5 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Borgdorff, J. F. A. Poulet, and C. C. H. Petersen Facilitating Sensory Responses in Developing Mouse Somatosensory Barrel Cortex J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2992 - 3003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Katz, J. E. Heiss, and I. Lampl Cross-Whisker Adaptation of Neurons in the Rat Barrel Cortex J. Neurosci., December 20, 2006; 26(51): 13363 - 13372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help