QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, October 4, 2006, 26(40):10154-10163; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2779-06.2006

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tassinari, H. Articles by Landy, M. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tassinari, H. Articles by Landy, M. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Combining Priors and Noisy Visual Cues in a Rapid Pointing Task

Hadley Tassinari,¹ Todd E. Hudson,^1,2 and Michael S. Landy^1,2

¹Department of Psychology and ²Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003

Correspondence should be addressed to Hadley Tassinari, New York University, Department of Psychology, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003. Email: HadleyTassinari{at}nyu.edu

Statistical decision theory suggests that choosing an ideal action requires taking several factors into account: (1) prior knowledge of the probability of various world states, (2) sensory information concerning the world state, (3) the probability of outcomes given a choice of action, and (4) the loss or gain associated with those outcomes. In previous work, we found that, in many circumstances, humans act like ideal decision makers in planning a reaching movement. They select a movement aim point that maximizes expected gain, thus taking into account outcome uncertainty (motor noise) and the consequences of their actions. Here, we ask whether humans can optimally combine prior knowledge and uncertain sensory information in planning a reach. Subjects rapidly pointed at unseen targets, indicated with dots drawn from a distribution centered on the invisible target location. Target location had a prior distribution, the form of which was known to the subject. We varied the number of dots and hence target spatial uncertainty. An analysis of the sources of uncertainty impacting performance in this task indicated that the optimal strategy was to aim between the mean of the prior (the screen center) and the mean stimulus location (centroid of the dot cloud). With increased target location uncertainty, the aim point should have moved closer to the prior. Subjects used near-optimal strategies, combining stimulus uncertainty and prior information appropriately. Observer behavior was well modeled as having three additional sources of inefficiency originating in the motor system, calculation of centroid location, and calculation of aim points.

Key words: movement planning; motor control; statistical decision theory; decision making; reaching; optimality

---

Received March 13, 2006; revised Aug. 24, 2006; accepted Aug. 25, 2006.

Correspondence should be addressed to Hadley Tassinari, New York University, Department of Psychology, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003. Email: HadleyTassinari{at}nyu.edu

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. F. Soechting, J. Z. Juveli, and H. M. Rao Models for the Extrapolation of Target Motion for Manual Interception J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1491 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Ronsse, R. C. Miall, and S. P. Swinnen Multisensory Integration in Dynamical Behaviors: Maximum Likelihood Estimation across Bimanual Skill Learning J. Neurosci., July 1, 2009; 29(26): 8419 - 8428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. I. Gold, C.-T. Law, P. Connolly, and S. Bennur The Relative Influences of Priors and Sensory Evidence on an Oculomotor Decision Variable During Perceptual Learning J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2653 - 2668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Izawa and R. Shadmehr On-Line Processing of Uncertain Information in Visuomotor Control J. Neurosci., October 29, 2008; 28(44): 11360 - 11368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Ghez, R. Scheidt, and H. Heijink Different Learned Coordinate Frames for Planning Trajectories and Final Positions in Reaching J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3614 - 3626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Gritsenko, N. I. Krouchev, and J. F. Kalaska Afferent Input, Efference Copy, Signal Noise, and Biases in Perception of Joint Angle During Active Versus Passive Elbow Movements J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1140 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. W. Battaglia and P. R. Schrater Humans Trade Off Viewing Time and Movement Duration to Improve Visuomotor Accuracy in a Fast Reaching Task J. Neurosci., June 27, 2007; 27(26): 6984 - 6994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help