QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, October 18, 2006, 26(42):10883-10887; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2238-06.2006

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chhabra, M. Articles by Jacobs, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chhabra, M. Articles by Jacobs, R. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Brief Communications
Near-Optimal Human Adaptive Control across Different Noise Environments

Manu Chhabra and Robert A. Jacobs

Departments of Computer Science and Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627

Correspondence should be addressed to Robert A. Jacobs at the above address. Email: robbie{at}bcs.rochester.edu

A person learning to control a complex system needs to learn about both the dynamics and the noise of the system. We evaluated human subjects' abilities to learn to control a stochastic dynamic system under different noise conditions. These conditions were created by corrupting the forces applied to the system with noise whose magnitudes were either proportional or inversely proportional to the sizes of subjects' control signals. We also used dynamic programming to calculate the mathematically optimal control laws of an "ideal actor" for each noise condition. The results suggest that people learned control strategies tailored to the specific noise characteristics of their training conditions. In particular, as predicted by the ideal actors, they learned to use smaller control signals when forces were corrupted by proportional noise and to use larger signals when forces were corrupted by inversely proportional noise, thereby achieving levels of performance near the information-theoretic upper bounds. We conclude that subjects learned to behave in a near-optimal manner, meaning that they learned to efficiently use all available information to plan and execute control policies that maximized performances on their tasks.

Key words: visuomotor control; motor learning; human; performance; movement; ideal actor analysis

---

Received March 7, 2006; revised Aug. 17, 2006; accepted Sept. 13, 2006.

Correspondence should be addressed to Robert A. Jacobs at the above address. Email: robbie{at}bcs.rochester.edu

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Fishbach and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi Seeing versus Believing: Conflicting Immediate and Predicted Feedback Lead to Suboptimal Motor Performance J. Neurosci., December 24, 2008; 28(52): 14140 - 14146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Izawa, T. Rane, O. Donchin, and R. Shadmehr Motor Adaptation as a Process of Reoptimization J. Neurosci., March 12, 2008; 28(11): 2883 - 2891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help