The Journal of Neuroscience, May 9, 2007, 27(19):5207-5214; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0318-07.2007
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Processing Asymmetry of Transitions between Order and Disorder in Human Auditory Cortex
Maria Chait,1
David Poeppel,1,2,3
Alain de Cheveigné,5 and
Jonathan Z. Simon1,3,4
1Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, 2Department of Linguistics, 3Department of Biology, 4Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, 5Laboratoire de Psychologie de la Perception (Formation de Recherche en Évolution 2929), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paris Descartes, and Département d'Etudes Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Paris 75230, France
Correspondence should be addressed to Maria Chait, Equipe Audition, Département d'Etudes Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, 29 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75230, France. Email: mariac{at}wam.umd.edu
Auditory environments vary as a result of the appearance and disappearance of acoustic sources, as well as fluctuations characteristic of the sources themselves. The appearance of an object is often manifest as a transition in the pattern of ongoing fluctuation, rather than an onset or offset of acoustic power. How does the system detect and process such transitions? Based on magnetoencephalography data, we show that the temporal dynamics and response morphology of the neural temporal-edge detection processes depend in precise ways on the nature of the change. We measure auditory cortical responses to transitions between "disorder," modeled as a sequence of random frequency tone pips, and "order," modeled as a constant tone. Such transitions embody key characteristics of natural auditory edges. Early cortical responses (from
50 ms post-transition) reveal that orderdisorder transitions, and vice versa, are processed by different neural mechanisms. Their dynamics suggest that the auditory cortex optimally adjusts to stimulus statistics, even when this is not required for overt behavior. Furthermore, this response profile bears a striking similarity to that measured from another orderdisorder transition, between interaurally correlated and uncorrelated noise, a radically different stimulus. This parallelism suggests the existence of a general mechanism that operates early in the processing stream on the abstract statistics of the auditory input, and is putatively related to the processes of constructing a new representation or detecting a deviation from a previously acquired model of the auditory scene. Together, the data reveal information about the mechanisms with which the brain samples, represents, and detects changes in the environment.
Key words: auditory evoked response; magnetoencephalography; auditory cortex; integration window; change detection; scene analysis; M100; M50; MMN
Received Jan. 24, 2007;
revised March 17, 2007;
accepted April 11, 2007.
Correspondence should be addressed to Maria Chait, Equipe Audition, Département d'Etudes Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, 29 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75230, France. Email: mariac{at}wam.umd.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Friston and S. Kiebel
Predictive coding under the free-energy principle
Phil Trans R Soc B,
May 12, 2009;
364(1521):
1211 - 1221.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Ross
A Novel Type of Auditory Responses: Temporal Dynamics of 40-Hz Steady-State Responses Induced by Changes in Sound Localization
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 2008;
100(3):
1265 - 1277.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|