 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, June 6, 2007, 27(23):6291-6301; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0061-07.2007
Previous Article | Next Article
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Dissociating Timing and Coordination as Functions of the Cerebellum
Jörn Diedrichsen,1,2 Sarah E. Criscimagna-Hemminger,1 andReza Shadmehr1 1Laboratory for Computational Motor Control, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, and 2Wolfson Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2AS, United Kingdom
Correspondence should be addressed to Jörn Diedrichsen at the above address. Email: j.diedrichsen{at}bangor.ac.uk
The function of the cerebellum in motor control is a long-standing puzzle because cerebellar damage is associated with both timing and coordination deficits. Timing is the ability to produce consistent intervals between movements based on an internal representation of time. Coordination, in contrast, is a state-dependent control process in which motor commands to one effector depend on the predicted state of another effector. Here we considered a task consisting of two components, an arm movement and an isometric press with the thumb. We found that when the two components temporally overlapped, the brain controlled the thumb using an estimate of the state of the arm. In contrast, when the components did not temporally overlap, the brain controlled the thumb solely based on an internal estimate of time. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we contrasted these two conditions and found that lobule V of the cerebellum ipsilateral to the arm movement was consistently more activated during state-dependent control. When the brain learned time-dependent control, no region of the cerebellum showed consistently increased activity compared with state-dependent control. Rather, the consistent activity associated with time-dependent control was found in language areas of the left cerebral hemisphere along the Sylvian fissure. We suggest that timing and coordination are behaviorally distinct modes of motor control and that the anterior cerebellum is a crucial node in state-dependent motor control, computing a predictive state estimate of one effector (e.g., the arm) to coordinate actions of another effector (the thumb).
Key words: motor control; fMRI; timing; forward models; generalization; cerebellum
Received Jan. 7, 2007; revised April 24, 2007; accepted April 25, 2007.
Correspondence should be addressed to Jörn Diedrichsen at the above address. Email: j.diedrichsen{at}bangor.ac.uk
This article has been cited by other articles:
T. Kimura and H. Gomi
Temporal Development of Anticipatory Reflex Modulation to Dynamical Interactions During Arm Movement
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2220 - 2231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. C. Gidley Larson, A. J. Bastian, O. Donchin, R. Shadmehr, and S. H. Mostofsky
Acquisition of internal models of motor tasks in children with autism
Brain, November 1, 2008; 131(11): 2894 - 2903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
T. Liu, D. Xu, J. Ashe, and K. Bushara
Specificity of Inferior Olive Response to Stimulus Timing
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1557 - 1561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
W. L. Miller, V. Maffei, G. Bosco, M. Iosa, M. Zago, E. Macaluso, and F. Lacquaniti
Vestibular Nuclei and Cerebellum Put Visual Gravitational Motion in Context
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1969 - 1982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|