The Journal of Neuroscience, June 20, 2007, 27(25):6810-6814; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1248-07.2007
Previous Article | Next Article 
Brief Communications
Auditory Feedback and Song Production Do Not Regulate Seasonal Growth of Song Control Circuits in Adult White-Crowned Sparrows
Eliot A. Brenowitz,1,2,4
Karin Lent,1 and
Edwin W. Rubel3,4
Departments of 1Psychology, 2Biology, and 3Otolaryngology, and 4The Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1525
Correspondence should be addressed to Eliot A. Brenowitz, Department of Psychology, Box 351525, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1525. Email: eliotb{at}u.washington.edu
An important area of research in neuroscience is understanding what properties of brain structure and function are stimulated by sensory experience and behavioral performance. We tested the roles of experience and behavior in seasonal plasticity of the neural circuits that regulate learned song behavior in adult songbirds. Neurons in these circuits receive auditory input and show selective auditory responses to conspecific song. We asked whether auditory input or song production contribute to seasonal growth of telencephalic song nuclei. Adult male Gambel's white-crowned sparrows were surgically deafened, which eliminates auditory input and greatly reduces song production. These birds were then exposed to photoperiod and hormonal conditions that regulate the growth of song nuclei. We measured the volumes of the nuclei HVC, robust nucleus of arcopallium (RA), and area X at 7 and 30 d after exposure to long days plus testosterone in deafened and normally hearing birds. We also assessed song production and examined protein kinase C (PKC) expression because previous research reported that immunostaining for PKC increases transiently after deafening. Deafening did not delay or block the growth of the song nuclei to their full breeding-condition size. PKC activity in RA was not altered by deafening in the sparrows. Song continued to be well structured for up to 10 months after deafening, but song production decreased almost eightfold. These results suggest that neither auditory input nor high rates of song production are necessary for seasonal growth of the adult song control system in this species.
Key words: seasonal; plasticity; auditory; birdsong; testosterone; bird
Received March 20, 2007;
revised May 7, 2007;
accepted May 20, 2007.
Correspondence should be addressed to Eliot A. Brenowitz, Department of Psychology, Box 351525, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1525. Email: eliotb{at}u.washington.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. W. Sockman, K. G. Salvante, D. M. Racke, C. R. Campbell, and B. A. Whitman
Song competition changes the brain and behavior of a male songbird
J. Exp. Biol.,
August 1, 2009;
212(15):
2411 - 2418.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Wissman and E. A. Brenowitz
The Role of Neurotrophins in the Seasonal-Like Growth of the Avian Song Control System
J. Neurosci.,
May 20, 2009;
29(20):
6461 - 6471.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Meitzen, I. T. Moore, K. Lent, E. A. Brenowitz, and D. J. Perkel
Steroid Hormones Act Transsynaptically within the Forebrain to Regulate Neuronal Phenotype and Song Stereotypy
J. Neurosci.,
October 31, 2007;
27(44):
12045 - 12057.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|