The Journal of Neuroscience, June 20, 2007, 27(25):6832-6842; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1323-07.2007
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Variation, Signal, and Noise in Cerebellar SensoryMotor Processing for Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements
Javier F. Medina and
Stephen G. Lisberger
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Physiology, W. M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0444
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Javier F. Medina, Department of Physiology, Box 0444, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Room HSE-808, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0444. Email: jmedina{at}phy.ucsf.edu
Neural responses are variable, yet motor performance can be quite precise. To ask how neural signal and noise are processed in the brain during sensorymotor behavior, we have evaluated the trial-by-trial variation of Purkinje cell (PC) activity in the floccular complex of the cerebellum, an intermediate stage in the neural circuit for smooth-pursuit eye movements. We find strong correlations between small trial-by-trial variations in the simple spike activity of individual PCs and the eye movements at the initiation of pursuit. The correlation is lower but still present during steady-state pursuit. Recordings from a few pairs of PCs verified the predictions of a model of the PC population, that there is a transition from highly covariant PC activity during movement initiation to more independent activity later on. Application to the data of a theoretical and computational analysis suggests that variation in pursuit initiation arises mostly from variation in visual motion signals that provide common inputs to the PC population. Variation in eye movement during steady-state pursuit can be attributed primarily to signal-dependent motor noise that arises downstream from PCs.
Key words: flocculus; correlation; noise reduction; cerebellum; motor control; visual motion
Received March 24, 2007;
revised April 27, 2007;
accepted May 14, 2007.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Javier F. Medina, Department of Physiology, Box 0444, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Room HSE-808, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0444. Email: jmedina{at}phy.ucsf.edu
Related articles in J. Neurosci.:
- This Week in The Journal
J. Neurosci. 2007 27: i.
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. Medina and S. G. Lisberger
Encoding and Decoding of Learned Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements in the Floccular Complex of the Monkey Cerebellum
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2009;
102(4):
2039 - 2054.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. C. Osborne and S. G. Lisberger
Spatial and Temporal Integration of Visual Motion Signals for Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements in Monkeys
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2009;
102(4):
2013 - 2025.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Baier, P. Stoeter, and M. Dieterich
Anatomical correlates of ocular motor deficits in cerebellar lesions
Brain,
August 1, 2009;
132(8):
2114 - 2124.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Huang and S. G. Lisberger
Noise Correlations in Cortical Area MT and Their Potential Impact on Trial-by-Trial Variation in the Direction and Speed of Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol,
June 1, 2009;
101(6):
3012 - 3030.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. T. Walter and and K. Khodakhah
The advantages of linear information processing for cerebellar computation
PNAS,
March 17, 2009;
106(11):
4471 - 4476.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Sober, M. J. Wohlgemuth, and M. S. Brainard
Central Contributions to Acoustic Variation in Birdsong
J. Neurosci.,
October 8, 2008;
28(41):
10370 - 10379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|