The Journal of Neuroscience, July 11, 2007, 27(28):7498-7507; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2118-07.2007
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Direct Instrumental Conditioning of Neural Activity Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Reward Feedback
Signe Bray,1
Shinsuke Shimojo,1,2 and
John P. O'Doherty1,3
1Computation and Neural Systems Program, 2Division of Biology, and 3Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. John P. O'Doherty, Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125. Email: jdoherty{at}hss.caltech.edu
Successful learning is often contingent on feedback. In instrumental conditioning, an animal or human learns to perform specific responses to obtain reward. Instrumental conditioning is often used by behavioral psychologists to train an animal (or human) to produce a desired behavior. Shaping involves reinforcing those behaviors, which in a stepwise manner are successively closer to the desired behavior until the desired behavior is reached. Here, we aimed to extend this traditional approach to directly shape neural activity instead of overt behavior. To achieve this, we scanned 22 human subjects with functional magnetic resonance imaging and performed image processing in parallel with acquisition. We delineated regions of interest (ROIs) in finger and toe motor/somatosensory regions and used an instrumental shaping procedure to induce a regionally specific increase in activity by providing an explicit monetary reward to reinforce neural activity in the target areas. After training, we found a significant and regionally specific increase in activity in the ROI being rewarded (finger or toe) and a decrease in activity in the nonrewarded region. This demonstrates that instrumental conditioning procedures can be used to directly shape neural activity, even without the production of an overt behavioral response. This procedure offers an important alternative to traditional biofeedback-based approaches and may be useful in the development of future therapies for stroke and other brain disorders.
Key words: conditioned; conditioning; feedback; fMRI; motor cortex; operant; reward
Received Jan. 15, 2007;
revised June 4, 2007;
accepted June 4, 2007.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. John P. O'Doherty, Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125. Email: jdoherty{at}hss.caltech.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Broetz, S. R Soekadar, and N. Birbaumer
On "A four-week, task-specific neuroprosthesis program..." Dunning K, et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:397-405.
Physical Therapy,
August 1, 2008;
88(8):
970 - 970.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bray, A. Rangel, S. Shimojo, B. Balleine, and J. P O'Doherty
The Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Influence of Pavlovian Cues on Human Decision Making
J. Neurosci.,
May 28, 2008;
28(22):
5861 - 5866.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|