WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience Fine Science Tools - Extraordinary Craftsmanship
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP
The Journal of Neuroscience, January 31, 2007, 27(5):1123-1128; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4198-06.2007

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cowan, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fortune, E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cowan, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fortune, E. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Brief Communications
The Critical Role of Locomotion Mechanics in Decoding Sensory Systems

Noah J. Cowan1 and Eric S. Fortune2

Departments of 1Mechanical Engineering and 2Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218

Correspondence should be addressed to Noah J. Cowan, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. Email: ncowan{at}jhu.edu

How do neural systems process sensory information to control locomotion? The weakly electric knifefish Eigenmannia, an ideal model for studying sensorimotor control, swims to stabilize the sensory image of a sinusoidally moving refuge. Tracking performance is best at stimulus frequencies less than ~1 Hz. Kinematic analysis, which is widely used in the study of neural control of movement, predicts commensurately low-pass sensory processing for control. The inclusion of Newtonian mechanics in the analysis of the behavior, however, categorically shifts the prediction: this analysis predicts that sensory processing is high pass. The counterintuitive prediction that a low-pass behavior is controlled by a high-pass neural filter nevertheless matches previously reported but poorly understood high-pass filtering seen in electrosensory afferents and downstream neurons. Furthermore, a model incorporating the high-pass controller matches animal behavior, whereas the model with the low-pass controller does not and is unstable. Because locomotor mechanics are similar in a wide array of animals, these data suggest that such high-pass sensory filters may be a general mechanism used for task-level locomotion control. Furthermore, these data highlight the critical role of mechanical analyses in addition to widely used kinematic analyses in the study of neural control systems.

Key words: electroreception; closed-loop model; Gymnotiformes; ribbon fin; sensorimotor control; Eigenmannia; untethered

Received Sept. 26, 2006; revised Dec. 8, 2006; accepted Dec. 20, 2006.

Correspondence should be addressed to Noah J. Cowan, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. Email: ncowan{at}jhu.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. A. Shirgaonkar, O. M. Curet, N. A. Patankar, and M. A. MacIver
The hydrodynamics of ribbon-fin propulsion during impulsive motion
J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2008; 211(21): 3490 - 3503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help
-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-