The Journal of Neuroscience, February 7, 2007, 27(6):1266-1270; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3975-06.2007
Previous Article | Next Article 
Brief Communications
Similar Neural Representations of the Target for Saccades and Perception during Search
Miguel P. Eckstein,1
Brent R. Beutter,2
Binh T. Pham,1
Steven S. Shimozaki,1 and
Leland S. Stone2
1Vision and Image Understanding Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, and 2Human System-Integration Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035
Correspondence should be addressed to Miguel P. Eckstein, Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106. Email: eckstein{at}psych.ucsb.edu
Are the body's actions and the mind's perceptions the result of shared neural processing, or are they performed largely independently? The brain has two major processing streams, and some have proposed that this division segregates visual processing for action and perception. The ventral pathway is claimed to support conscious experience (perception), whereas the dorsal pathway is claimed to support the control of movement (action). Others have argued that perception and action share much of their visual processing within the primate cortex. During visual search, the brain performs a sophisticated deployment of eye movements (saccadic actions) to gather information to subserve perceptual judgments. The relationship between the neural mechanisms mediating perception and action in visual search remains unexplored. Here, we investigate the visual representation of target information in the human brain, both for perceptual decisions and for saccadic actions during visual search. We use classification image analysis, a form of reverse correlation, to estimate the behavioral receptive fields of the visual mechanisms responsible for saccadic and perceptual responses during the same visual search task. Results show that the behavioral receptive fields mediating the perceptual decisions are indistinguishable from those driving the oculomotor decisions, suggesting that similar neural mechanisms are responsible for both perception and oculomotor action during search. Diverging target representations would result in an inefficient coupling between eye movement planning and perceptual judgments. Thus, a common target representation would be more optimal and might be expected to have evolved through natural selection in the neural systems responsible for visual search.
Key words: visual search; eye movements; behavioral receptive fields; perception and action; decision; eye position
Received Sept. 12, 2006;
revised Dec. 7, 2006;
accepted Dec. 8, 2006.
Correspondence should be addressed to Miguel P. Eckstein, Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106. Email: eckstein{at}psych.ucsb.edu
Related articles in J. Neurosci.:
- A Single Route to Action? The Common Representation of Perceptual and Saccade Targets
- Thérèse Collins
J. Neurosci. 2007 27: 3935-3936.
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Cardoso-Leite and A. Gorea
Comparison of Perceptual and Motor Decisions Via Confidence Judgments and Saccade Curvature
J Neurophysiol,
June 1, 2009;
101(6):
2822 - 2836.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. de'Sperati and G. Baud-Bovy
Blind Saccades: An Asynchrony between Seeing and Looking
J. Neurosci.,
April 23, 2008;
28(17):
4317 - 4321.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Collins
A Single Route to Action? The Common Representation of Perceptual and Saccade Targets
J. Neurosci.,
April 11, 2007;
27(15):
3935 - 3936.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|