QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, March 5, 2008, 28(10):2426-2434; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4196-07.2008

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tremblay, S. Articles by Ostry, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tremblay, S. Articles by Ostry, D. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Specificity of Speech Motor Learning

Stéphanie Tremblay,¹ Guillaume Houle,¹ and David J. Ostry^1,2

¹Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada H3A 1B1, and ²Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut 06511

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. David J. Ostry, Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Québec, Canada H3A 1B1. Email: ostry{at}motion.psych.mcgill.ca

The idea that the brain controls movement using a neural representation of limb dynamics has been a dominant hypothesis in motor control research for well over a decade. Speech movements offer an unusual opportunity to test this proposal by means of an examination of transfer of learning between utterances that are to varying degrees matched on kinematics. If speech learning results in a generalizable dynamics representation, then, at the least, learning should transfer when similar movements are embedded in phonetically distinct utterances. We tested this idea using three different pairs of training and transfer utterances that substantially overlap kinematically. We find that, with these stimuli, speech learning is highly contextually sensitive and fails to transfer even to utterances that involve very similar movements. Speech learning appears to be extremely local, and the specificity of learning is incompatible with the idea that speech control involves a generalized dynamics representation.

Key words: dynamics; generalization; adaptation; jaw; motor learning; speech

---

Received Jan. 29, 2007; revised Jan. 8, 2008; accepted Jan. 9, 2008.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. David J. Ostry, Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Québec, Canada H3A 1B1. Email: ostry{at}motion.psych.mcgill.ca

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help