WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, March 19, 2008, 28(12):3017-3029; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4761-07.2008

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiani, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shadlen, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiani, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shadlen, M. N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Bounded Integration in Parietal Cortex Underlies Decisions Even When Viewing Duration Is Dictated by the Environment

Roozbeh Kiani, Timothy D. Hanks, and Michael N. Shadlen

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, National Primate Research Center, and Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

Correspondence should be addressed to Michael N. Shadlen, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, National Primate Research Center, and Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195. Email: shadlen{at}u.washington.edu

Decisions about sensory stimuli are often based on an accumulation of evidence in time. When subjects control stimulus duration, the decision terminates when the accumulated evidence reaches a criterion level. Under many natural circumstances and in many laboratory settings, the environment, rather than the subject, controls the stimulus duration. In these settings, it is generally assumed that subjects commit to a choice at the end of the stimulus stream. Indeed, failure to benefit from the full stream of information is interpreted as a sign of imperfect accumulation or memory leak. Contrary to these assumptions, we show that monkeys performing a direction discrimination task commit to a choice when the accumulated evidence reaches a threshold level (or bound), sometimes long before the end of stimulus. This bounded accumulation of evidence is reflected in the activity of neurons in the lateral intraparietal cortex. Thus, the readout of visual cortex embraces a termination rule to limit processing even when potentially useful information is available.

Key words: lateral intraparietal area; LIP; perceptual decision; bounded accumulation; leaky accumulation; direction discrimination; electrophysiology; psychophysics; vision


Received Oct. 20, 2007; revised Jan. 4, 2008; accepted Jan. 26, 2008.

Correspondence should be addressed to Michael N. Shadlen, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, National Primate Research Center, and Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195. Email: shadlen{at}u.washington.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. M. Herrington and J. A. Assad
Neural Activity in the Middle Temporal Area and Lateral Intraparietal Area during Endogenously Cued Shifts of Attention
J. Neurosci., November 11, 2009; 29(45): 14160 - 14176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Cisek, G. A. Puskas, and S. El-Murr
Decisions in Changing Conditions: The Urgency-Gating Model
J. Neurosci., September 16, 2009; 29(37): 11560 - 11571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. C. Ho, S. Brown, and J. T. Serences
Domain General Mechanisms of Perceptual Decision Making in Human Cortex
J. Neurosci., July 8, 2009; 29(27): 8675 - 8687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Albantakis and G. Deco
The encoding of alternatives in multiple-choice decision making
PNAS, June 23, 2009; 106(25): 10308 - 10313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. R. Cohen and W. T. Newsome
Estimates of the Contribution of Single Neurons to Perception Depend on Timescale and Noise Correlation
J. Neurosci., May 20, 2009; 29(20): 6635 - 6648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Kiani and M. N. Shadlen
Representation of Confidence Associated with a Decision by Neurons in the Parietal Cortex
Science, May 8, 2009; 324(5928): 759 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. I. Gold, C.-T. Law, P. Connolly, and S. Bennur
The Relative Influences of Priors and Sensory Evidence on an Oculomotor Decision Variable During Perceptual Learning
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2653 - 2668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
F. Ostendorf
Saccadic Eye Movements Illuminate Chronometry of Perceptual Localization
J. Neurosci., September 10, 2008; 28(37): 9090 - 9091.
[Full Text] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-