The Journal of Neuroscience, April 23, 2008, 28(17):4446-4456; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5138-07.2008
Previous Article | Next Article 
Neurobiology of Disease
High-Resolution Electrical Stimulation of Primate Retina for Epiretinal Implant Design
Chris Sekirnjak,1
Pawel Hottowy,2
Alexander Sher,2
Wladyslaw Dabrowski,3
Alan M. Litke,2 and
E. J. Chichilnisky1
1Systems Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, San Diego, California 92037, 2Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, and 3Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, 23 30-059, Krakow, Poland
Correspondence should be addressed to E. J. Chichilnisky, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037. Email: ej{at}salk.edu
The development of retinal implants for the blind depends crucially on understanding how neurons in the retina respond to electrical stimulation. This study used multielectrode arrays to stimulate ganglion cells in the peripheral macaque retina, which is very similar to the human retina. Analysis was restricted to parasol cells, which form one of the major high-resolution visual pathways in primates. Individual cells were characterized using visual stimuli, and subsequently targeted for electrical stimulation using electrodes 9–15 µm in diameter. Results were accumulated across 16 ON and 9 OFF parasol cells. At threshold, all cells responded to biphasic electrical pulses 0.05–0.1 ms in duration by firing a single spike with latency lower than 0.35 ms. The average threshold charge density was 0.050 ± 0.005 mC/cm2, significantly below established safety limits for platinum electrodes. ON and OFF ganglion cells were stimulated with similar efficacy. Repetitive stimulation elicited spikes within a 0.1 ms time window, indicating that the high temporal precision necessary for spike-by-spike stimulation can be achieved in primate retina. Spatial analysis of observed thresholds suggests that electrical activation occurred near the axon hillock, and that dendrites contributed little. Finally, stimulation of a single parasol cell produced little or no activation of other cells in the ON and OFF parasol cell mosaics. The low-threshold, temporally precise, and spatially specific responses hold promise for the application of high-density arrays of small electrodes in epiretinal implants.
Key words: prosthetic; threshold; precision; evoked; macaque; receptive field; retina; visual
Received Nov. 19, 2007;
revised March 19, 2008;
accepted March 21, 2008.
Correspondence should be addressed to E. J. Chichilnisky, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037. Email: ej{at}salk.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Tsai, J. W. Morley, G. J. Suaning, and N. H. Lovell
Direct Activation and Temporal Response Properties of Rabbit Retinal Ganglion Cells Following Subretinal Stimulation
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 2009;
102(5):
2982 - 2993.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. I. Fried, A. C. W. Lasker, N. J. Desai, D. K. Eddington, and J. F. Rizzo 3rd
Axonal Sodium-Channel Bands Shape the Response to Electric Stimulation in Retinal Ganglion Cells
J Neurophysiol,
April 1, 2009;
101(4):
1972 - 1987.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|