QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, April 23, 2008, 28(17):4512-4520; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0742-07.2008

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Chrobak, J. J. Articles by Sabolek, H. R. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chrobak, J. J. Articles by Sabolek, H. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Revealing Past Memories: Proactive Interference and Ketamine-Induced Memory Deficits

James J. Chrobak, James R. Hinman, and Helen R. Sabolek

Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269

Correspondence should be addressed to James J. Chrobak, Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269. Email: james.chrobak{at}uconn.edu

Memories of events that occur often are sensitive to interference from memories of similar events. Proactive interference plays an important and often unexamined role in memory testing for spatially and temporally unique events ("episodes"). Ketamine (NMDA receptor antagonist) treatment in humans and other mammals induces a constellation of cognitive deficits, including impairments in working and episodic memory. We examined the effects of the ketamine (2.5–100 mg/kg) on the acquisition, retrieval, and retention of memory in a delayed-match-to-place radial water maze task that can be used to assess proactive interference. Ketamine (2.5–25 mg/kg, i.p.) given 20 min before the sample trial, impaired encoding. The first errors made during the test trial were predominantly to arms located spatially adjacent to the goal arm, suggesting an established albeit weakened representation. Ketamine (25–100 mg/kg) given immediately after the sample trial had no effect on retention. Ketamine given before the test trial impaired retrieval. First errors under the influence of ketamine were predominantly to the goal location of the previous session. Thus, ketamine treatment promoted proactive interference. These memory deficits were not state dependent, because ketamine treatment at both encoding and retrieval only increased the number of errors during the test session. These data demonstrate the competing influence of distinct memory representations during the performance of a memory task in the rat. Furthermore, they demonstrate the subtle disruptive effects of the NMDA antagonist ketamine on both encoding and retrieval. Specifically, ketamine treatment disrupted retrieval by promoting proactive interference from previous episodic representations.

Key words: memory; NMDA; hippocampus; prefrontal cortex; water maze; radial maze; schizophrenia

---

Received Oct. 18, 2006; revised March 13, 2008; accepted March 17, 2008.

Correspondence should be addressed to James J. Chrobak, Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269. Email: james.chrobak{at}uconn.edu

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help