 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, July 9, 2008, 28(28):7153-7164; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4398-07.2008
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Sound-Intensity-Dependent Compensation for the Small Interaural Time Difference Cue for Sound Source Localization
Eri Nishino,1
Rei Yamada,1
Hiroshi Kuba,1
Hiroyuki Hioki,2
Takahiro Furuta,2
Takeshi Kaneko,2 and
Harunori Ohmori1
Departments of 1Physiology and 2Morphological Brain Science, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
Correspondence should be addressed to Harunori Ohmori at the above address. Email: ohmori{at}nbiol.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Interaural time difference (ITD) is a major cue for sound source localization. However, animals with small heads experience small ITDs, making ITD detection difficult, particularly for low-frequency sound. Here, we describe a sound-intensity-dependent mechanism for compensating for the small ITD cues in the coincidence detector neurons in the nucleus laminaris (NL) of the chicken aged from 3 to 29 d after hatching. The hypothesized compensation mechanisms were confirmed by simulation. In vivo single-unit recordings revealed an improved contrast of ITD tuning in low-best-frequency (<1 kHz) NL neurons by suppressing the firing activity at the worst ITD, whereas the firing rate was increased with increasing sound intensity at the best ITD. In contrast, level-dependent suppression was so weak in the middle- and high-best-frequency ( 1 kHz) NL neurons that loud sounds led to increases in firing rate at both the best and the worst ITDs. The suppression of firing activity at the worst ITD in the low-best-frequency neurons required the activation of the superior olivary nucleus (SON) and was eliminated by electrolytic lesions of the SON. The frequency-dependent suppression reflected the dense projection from the SON to the low-frequency region of NL. Thus, the small ITD cues available in low-frequency sounds were partly compensated for by a sound-intensity-dependent inhibition from the SON.
Key words: sound localization; interaural time difference; nucleus laminaris; nucleus magnocellularis; coincidence detection; superior olivary nucleus
Received Sept. 26, 2007;
revised May 28, 2008;
accepted June 6, 2008.
Correspondence should be addressed to Harunori Ohmori at the above address. Email: ohmori{at}nbiol.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Tillein, P. Hubka, E. Syed, R. Hartmann, A.K. Engel, and A. Kral
Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference in Congenital Deafness
Cereb Cortex,
November 11, 2009;
(2009)
bhp222v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z.-Q. Tang, H. Gao, and Y. Lu
Control of a Depolarizing GABAergic Input in an Auditory Coincidence Detection Circuit
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 2009;
102(3):
1672 - 1683.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. P. Kuo, L. A. Bradley, and L. O. Trussell
Heterogeneous Kinetics and Pharmacology of Synaptic Inhibition in the Chick Auditory Brainstem
J. Neurosci.,
July 29, 2009;
29(30):
9625 - 9634.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Carr, D. Soares, J. Smolders, and J. Z. Simon
Detection of Interaural Time Differences in the Alligator
J. Neurosci.,
June 24, 2009;
29(25):
7978 - 7990.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|