The Journal of Neuroscience, September 3, 2008, 28(36):8929-8933; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1450-08.2008
Previous Article | Next Article 
Brief Communications
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Disrupts the Perception and Embodiment of Facial Expressions
David Pitcher,
Lúcia Garrido,
Vincent Walsh, and
Bradley C. Duchaine
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom
Correspondence should be addressed to David Pitcher, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University College London, Alexandra House, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK. Email: d.pitcher{at}ucl.ac.uk
Theories of embodied cognition propose that recognizing facial expressions requires visual processing followed by simulation of the somatovisceral responses associated with the perceived expression. To test this proposal, we targeted the right occipital face area (rOFA) and the face region of right somatosensory cortex (rSC) with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) while participants discriminated facial expressions. rTMS selectively impaired discrimination of facial expressions at both sites but had no effect on a matched face identity task. Site specificity within the rSC was demonstrated by targeting rTMS at the face and finger regions while participants performed the expression discrimination task. rTMS targeted at the face region impaired task performance relative to rTMS targeted at the finger region. To establish the temporal course of visual and somatosensory contributions to expression processing, double-pulse TMS was delivered at different times to rOFA and rSC during expression discrimination. Accuracy dropped when pulses were delivered at 60–100 ms at rOFA and at 100–140 and 130–170 ms at rSC. These sequential impairments at rOFA and rSC support embodied accounts of expression recognition as well as hierarchical models of face processing. The results also demonstrate that nonvisual cortical areas contribute during early stages of expression processing.
Key words: face perception; embodied cognition; emotion; transcranial magnetic stimulation; somatosensory cortex; occipital face area
Received April 4, 2008;
revised June 30, 2008;
accepted July 2, 2008.
Correspondence should be addressed to David Pitcher, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University College London, Alexandra House, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK. Email: d.pitcher{at}ucl.ac.uk
Related articles in J. Neurosci.:
- Perception of Facial Expression in Somatosensory Cortex Supports Simulationist Models
- Elizabeth Hussey and Ashley Safford
J. Neurosci. 2009 29: 301-302.
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Tavares, P. J. Barnard, and A. D. Lawrence
Emotional Complexity and the Neural Representation of Emotion in Motion
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci,
March 5, 2010;
(2010)
nsq021v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Halberstadt, P. Winkielman, P. M. Niedenthal, and N. Dalle
Emotional Conception: How Embodied Emotion Concepts Guide Perception and Facial Action
Psychological Science,
October 1, 2009;
20(10):
1254 - 1261.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Winkielman, D. N. McIntosh, and L. Oberman
Embodied and Disembodied Emotion Processing: Learning From and About Typical and Autistic Individuals
Emotion Review,
April 1, 2009;
1(2):
178 - 190.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Hussey and A. Safford
Perception of Facial Expression in Somatosensory Cortex Supports Simulationist Models
J. Neurosci.,
January 14, 2009;
29(2):
301 - 302.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|