 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, January 23, 2008, 28(4):880-892; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2869-07.2008
Previous Article | Next Article
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Modulation of Muscle Synergy Recruitment in Primate Grasping
Simon A. Overduin,1 Andrea d'Avella,2 Jinsook Roh,1 andEmilio Bizzi1 1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, and 2Department of Neuromotor Physiology, Santa Lucia Foundation, 00179 Rome, Italy
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Simon A. Overduin, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 46-6177, 43 Vassar Street, Cambridge, MA 02139. Email: overduin{at}mit.edu
In grasping, the CNS controls a particularly large number of degrees of freedom. We tested the idea that this control is facilitated by the presence of muscle synergies. According to the strong version of this concept, these synergies are invariant, hard-wired patterns of activation across muscles. Synergies may serve as modules that linearly sum, each with specific amplitude and timing coefficients, to generate a large array of muscle patterns. We tested two predictions of the synergy model. A small number of synergies should (1) account for a large fraction of variation in muscle activity, and (2) be modulated in their recruitment by task variables, even in novel behavioral contexts. We also examined whether the synergies would (3) have broadly similar structures across animals. We recorded from 15 to 19 electrodes implanted in forelimb muscles of two rhesus macaques as they grasped and transported 25 objects of variable shape and size. We show that three synergies accounted for 81% of the electromyographic data variation in each monkey. Each synergy was modulated in its recruitment strength and/or timing by object shape and/or size. Even when synergies were extracted from a small subset of object shape and size conditions and then used to reconstruct the entire dataset, we observed highly similar synergies and patterns of modulation. The synergies were well conserved between monkeys, with two of the synergies exceeding chance structural similarity, and the third being recruited, in both animals, in proportion to the size of the object handled.
Key words: motor control; movement; muscle; EMG; hand; macaque
Received June 23, 2007; revised Dec. 6, 2007; accepted Dec. 7, 2007.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Simon A. Overduin, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 46-6177, 43 Vassar Street, Cambridge, MA 02139. Email: overduin{at}mit.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
V. C. K. Cheung, L. Piron, M. Agostini, S. Silvoni, A. Turolla, and E. Bizzi
Stability of muscle synergies for voluntary actions after cortical stroke in humans
PNAS, November 17, 2009; 106(46): 19563 - 19568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
V. C. K. Cheung, A. d'Avella, and E. Bizzi
Adjustments of Motor Pattern for Load Compensation Via Modulated Activations of Muscle Synergies During Natural Behaviors
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2009; 101(3): 1235 - 1257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. J. Kutch, A. D. Kuo, A. M. Bloch, and W. Z. Rymer
Endpoint Force Fluctuations Reveal Flexible Rather Than Synergistic Patterns of Muscle Cooperation
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2455 - 2471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter
Individual Premotor Drive Pulses, Not Time-Varying Synergies, Are the Units of Adjustment for Limb Trajectories Constructed in Spinal Cord
J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2409 - 2425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|