QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, April 15, 2009, 29(15):4871-4881; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5210-08.2009

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gilboa, A. Articles by Moscovitch, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gilboa, A. Articles by Moscovitch, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Lesions Produce Early Functional Alterations during Remote Memory Retrieval

Asaf Gilboa,^1,2 Claude Alain,^3,4 Yu He,³ Donald T. Stuss,^3,4,5 and Morris Moscovitch^3,4

¹Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel, ²Cognitive Neurology Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa 31096, Israel, ³Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6A 2E1, and ⁴Departments of Psychology and ⁵Medicine (Neurology, Rehabilitation Science), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G3

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Asaf Gilboa, Psychology Department, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel. Email: agilboa{at}psy.haifa.ac.il

We examined the role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) in memory retrieval monitoring. Event-related potentials were recorded while patients with VMPFC lesions and matched controls viewed faces of personal acquaintances, and of famous and nonfamous people, and indicated whether they had personally encountered these individuals. Patients were more likely than controls to make both false positive and false negative errors. Both groups showed a large posterior negative wave peaking at 170 ms after face onset (N170). In controls, the N170 was larger for both types of familiar faces, regardless of whether overt recognition occurred. Specifically, personal acquaintances that were erroneously judged as unfamiliar evoked the same electrophysiological response as those who were explicitly recognized. Patients' N170 was not modulated by familiarity suggesting VMPFC lesions disrupt early posterior memory-based preconscious cortical distinctions. Following the N170, there was a significant group difference over frontopolar scalp regions where patients were showing a smaller positive modulation at 230–260 ms for all stimulus types. In patients this modulation correlated highly with reaction times of correct responses, suggesting this early frontal modulation is related to the ability to make rapid correct decisions about memory content. Group differences over anterior sites were also noted at 350 ms after stimulus, reflecting a large sustained negativity of patients' waveforms, equal across conditions. The findings are consistent with a hypothesis of frontally mediated dual-monitoring system. An early automatic (preconscious) component is followed by a late elaborate process. We hypothesize that when both components are damaged, confabulation may occur.

---

Received Oct. 28, 2008; revised March 6, 2009; accepted March 12, 2009.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Asaf Gilboa, Psychology Department, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel. Email: agilboa{at}psy.haifa.ac.il

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help