The Journal of Neuroscience, April 22, 2009, 29(16):5276-5286; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6031-08.2009
Previous Article | Next Article 
Cellular/Molecular
Gap Junctions between Striatal Fast-Spiking Interneurons Regulate Spiking Activity and Synchronization as a Function of Cortical Activity
Johannes Hjorth,1,3
Kim T. Blackwell,4 and
Jeanette Hellgren Kotaleski1,2,3
1Computational Biology, School of Computer Science and Communication, Royal Institute of Technology, Albanova University Centre, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, 2Nobel Institute for Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, and 3Stockholm Brain Institute, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden, and 4Molecular Neuroscience Department, Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Correspondence should be addressed to Johannes Hjorth, Computational Biology, School of Computer Science and Communication, Royal Institute of Technology, Albanova University Centre, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. Email: hjorth{at}kth.se
Striatal fast-spiking (FS) interneurons are interconnected by gap junctions into sparsely connected networks. As demonstrated for cortical FS interneurons, these gap junctions in the striatum may cause synchronized spiking, which would increase the influence that FS neurons have on spiking by the striatal medium spiny (MS) neurons. Dysfunction of the basal ganglia is characterized by changes in synchrony or periodicity, thus gap junctions between FS interneurons may modulate synchrony and thereby influence behavior such as reward learning and motor control. To explore the roles of gap junctions on activity and spike synchronization in a striatal FS population, we built a network model of FS interneurons. Each FS connects to 30–40% of its neighbors, as found experimentally, and each FS interneuron in the network is activated by simulated corticostriatal synaptic inputs. Our simulations show that the proportion of synchronous spikes in FS networks with gap junctions increases with increased conductance of the electrical synapse; however, the synchronization effects are moderate for experimentally estimated conductances. Instead, the main tendency is that the presence of gap junctions reduces the total number of spikes generated in response to synaptic inputs in the network. The reduction in spike firing is due to shunting through the gap junctions; which is minimized or absent when the neurons receive coincident inputs. Together these findings suggest that a population of electrically coupled FS interneurons may function collectively as input detectors that are especially sensitive to synchronized synaptic inputs received from the cortex.
Received Dec. 18, 2008;
revised March 24, 2009;
accepted March 26, 2009.
Correspondence should be addressed to Johannes Hjorth, Computational Biology, School of Computer Science and Communication, Royal Institute of Technology, Albanova University Centre, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. Email: hjorth{at}kth.se
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. A. Pennartz, J. D. Berke, A. M. Graybiel, R. Ito, C. S. Lansink, M. van der Meer, A. D. Redish, K. S. Smith, and P. Voorn
Corticostriatal Interactions during Learning, Memory Processing, and Decision Making
J. Neurosci.,
October 14, 2009;
29(41):
12831 - 12838.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|