QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, June 3, 2009, 29(22):7208-7219; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6068-08.2009

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rich, E. L. Articles by Shapiro, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rich, E. L. Articles by Shapiro, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Rat Prefrontal Cortical Neurons Selectively Code Strategy Switches

Erin L. Rich and Matthew Shapiro

Fishberg Department of Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029

Correspondence should be addressed to Matthew Shapiro, Fishberg Department of Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave Levy Place, Box 1065, New York, NY 10029. Email: matthew.shapiro{at}mssm.edu

Multiple memory systems are distinguished by different sets of neuronal circuits and operating principles optimized to solve different problems across mammalian species (Tulving and Schacter, 1994). When a rat selects an arm in a plus maze, for example, the choice can be guided by distinct neural systems (White and Wise, 1999) that encode different relationships among perceived stimuli, actions, and reward. Thus, egocentric or stimulus–response associations require striatal circuits, whereas spatial or episodic learning requires hippocampal circuits (Packard et al., 1989). Although these memory systems function in parallel (Packard and McGaugh, 1996), they can also interact competitively or synergistically (Kim and Ragozzino, 2005). The neuronal mechanisms that coordinate these multiple memory systems are not fully known, but converging evidence suggests that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is central.

The PFC is crucial for abstract, rule-guided behavior in primates and for switching rapidly between memory strategies in rats. We now report that rat medial PFC neuronal activity predicts switching between hippocampus- and caudate-dependent memory strategies. Prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) neuronal activity changed as rats switched memory strategies even as the rats performed identical behaviors but did not change when rats learned new contingencies using the same strategy. PL dynamics anticipated learning performance whereas IL lagged, suggesting that the two regions help initiate and establish new strategies, respectively. These neuronal dynamics suggest that the PFC contributes to the coordination of memory strategies by integrating the predictive relationships among stimuli, actions, and reward.

---

Received Dec. 18, 2008; revised April 6, 2009; accepted April 27, 2009.

Correspondence should be addressed to Matthew Shapiro, Fishberg Department of Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave Levy Place, Box 1065, New York, NY 10029. Email: matthew.shapiro{at}mssm.edu

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. R. Squire Memory and Brain Systems: 1969-2009 J. Neurosci., October 14, 2009; 29(41): 12711 - 12716. [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help