QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, June 3, 2009, 29(22):7271-7277; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0065-09.2009

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dockery, C. A. Articles by Plewnia, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dockery, C. A. Articles by Plewnia, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Enhancement of Planning Ability by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Colleen A. Dockery,^1,2 Ruth Hueckel-Weng,² Niels Birbaumer,^2,4 and Christian Plewnia³

¹Max Planck Graduate School of Neural & Behavioral Sciences and ²Institute of Medical Psychology & Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tuebingen, D-72074 Tuebingen, Germany, ³Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany, and ⁴Ospedale San Camillo, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 30126 Venezia Lido, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Colleen A. Dockery, Institute of Medical Psychology & Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tuebingen, Gartenstrasse 29, D-72074 Tuebingen, Germany. Email: colleen.dockery{at}student.uni-tuebingen.de

The functional neuroanatomy of executive function critically involves the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been established as a noninvasive tool for transient modulation of cortical function. Here, we examined the effects of tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on planning function by using the Tower of London task to evaluate performance during and after anodal, cathodal (1 mA, 15 min), and sham tDCS in 24 healthy volunteers. The key finding was a double dissociation of polarity and training phase: improved performance was found with cathodal tDCS applied during acquisition and early consolidation, when preceding anodal tDCS, but not in the later training session. In contrast, anodal tDCS enhanced performance when applied in the later sessions following cathodal tDCS. Our results indicate that both anodal and cathodal tDCS can improve planning performance as quantified by the Tower of London test. Most importantly, these data demonstrate training-phase-specific effects of tDCS. We propose that excitability decreasing cathodal tDCS mediates its early beneficial effect through noise reduction of neuronal activity, whereas a further adaptive configuration of specific neuronal connections is supported by excitability enhancing anodal tDCS in the later training phase by enhanced efficacy of active connections. This gain of function was sustained in a follow-up 6 and 12 months after training. In conclusion, the specific coupling of stimulation and training phase interventions may support the treatment of cognitive disorders involving frontal lobe functions.

---

Received Jan. 6, 2009; revised April 30, 2009; accepted May 5, 2009.

Correspondence should be addressed to Colleen A. Dockery, Institute of Medical Psychology & Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tuebingen, Gartenstrasse 29, D-72074 Tuebingen, Germany. Email: colleen.dockery{at}student.uni-tuebingen.de

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help