QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kidokoro, Y. Articles by Kuromi, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kidokoro, Y. Articles by Kuromi, H. Pubmed/NCBI databases Substance via MeSH

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 6, 1941-1951, Copyright © 1986 by Society for Neuroscience

ARTICLE

Concanavalin A prevents acetylcholine receptor redistribution in Xenopus nerve-muscle cultures

Y Kidokoro, B Brass and H Kuromi

During neuromuscular junction formation ACh receptors accumulate at the nerve-contact region. It has been shown that this is at least partly due to lateral migration of existing receptors in the membrane (Anderson et al., 1977). Randomly diffusing ACh receptor molecules in the membrane may be trapped at the nerve-contact region to form a high receptor density area. If this were the major mechanism, cross-linking ACh receptors by tetravalent concanavalin A (Con A) should immobilize receptors and prevent nerve-induced receptor accumulation. We examined the effect of Con A on nerve-induced receptor accumulation and on the mobility of ACh receptors in cultured Xenopus muscle cells. ACh receptors were stained with tetramethyl rhodamine conjugated alpha- bungarotoxin. The cells were then treated briefly with Con A, and neural tube cells were added to these cultures. The mobility of ACh receptors was measured by the fluorescence photobleaching recovery method. The Con A treatment prevented rapid diffusion of ACh receptors as well as nerve-induced receptor accumulation. Functional synapse formation was not inhibited by this treatment. In contrast, divalent succinyl Con A did not affect the mobility of ACh receptors nor prevent nerve-induced ACh receptor accumulation. When the Con A concentration was varied, the blocking effect on the nerve-induced receptor accumulation changed in parallel with the mobile fraction of receptors. Newly inserted ACh receptors after the Con A treatment were found to be mobile and to accumulate at the nerve-contact region. In these cultures, new receptors accumulated around old, immobilized receptors in some areas along the nerve contact. This observation suggests that new receptors were inserted elsewhere and migrated to the nerve-contact region surrounding immobilized old ones. In addition to the accumulation of receptors, the nerve disperses preexisting receptor clusters prior to induction of high-density regions along the contact area, and, at this early stage, denervation disperses nerve-induced receptor clusters in Xenopus cultures (Kuromi and Kidokoro, 1984a, b). When cultures were treated with Con A, neither of these events occurred, suggesting that these are also diffusion-mediated.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. W. Cohen, C. Jacobson, P. D. Yurchenco, G. E. Morris, and S. Carbonetto Laminin-induced Clustering of Dystroglycan on Embryonic Muscle Cells: Comparison with Agrin-induced Clustering J. Cell Biol., March 10, 1997; 136(5): 1047 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help