WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience MBF Bioscience Autoneuron
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lacquaniti, F.
Right arrow Articles by Terzuolo, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lacquaniti, F.
Right arrow Articles by Terzuolo, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 7, 819-828, Copyright © 1987 by Society for Neuroscience


ARTICLE

Changes in spatial scale in drawing and handwriting: kinematic contributions by proximal and distal joints

F Lacquaniti, G Ferrigno, A Pedotti, JF Soechting and C Terzuolo

The coordination of arm and hand motions was studied in tasks involving drawing and handwriting movements of different amplitudes. To this end, pen motion was recorded by means of a digitizing table, while the positions of different markers on the limb were monitored by the ELITE system. It was found that the amplitude of shoulder and elbow angular motions scales roughly with the size of the figure drawn or of the script, whereas the amplitude of wrist and finger motions is small, independent of size. Consequently, the larger the limb movement, the smaller the magnitude of the contributions by motions at distal joints relative to that at proximal joints. Furthermore, while shoulder and elbow motions are tightly coupled (constant phase relation), motions at distal joints are loosely coupled to those at the proximal joints (variable phase relation). On the other hand, motion at distal joints increases the accuracy of the movement, as indicated by the smaller variability of pen trajectories compared to that of wrist trajectories.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Dipietro, H. I. Krebs, S. E. Fasoli, B. T. Volpe, J. Stein, C. Bever, and N. Hogan
Changing Motor Synergies in Chronic Stroke
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 757 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Y. P. Henriques, M. Flanders, and J. F. Soechting
Haptic Synthesis of Shapes and Sequences
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1808 - 1821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. P. Ivanenko, R. Grasso, V. Macellari, and F. Lacquaniti
Control of Foot Trajectory in Human Locomotion: Role of Ground Contact Forces in Simulated Reduced Gravity
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 3070 - 3089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Grasso, L. Bianchi, and F. Lacquaniti
Motor Patterns for Human Gait: Backward Versus Forward Locomotion
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 1868 - 1885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-