QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (31) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goodwin, A. W. Articles by Morley, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goodwin, A. W. Articles by Morley, J. W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 7, 2192-2202, Copyright © 1987 by Society for Neuroscience

ARTICLE

Sinusoidal movement of a grating across the monkey's fingerpad: effect of contact angle and force of the grating on afferent fiber responses

AW Goodwin and JW Morley

Responses were recorded from cutaneous afferents innervating mechanoreceptors in the monkey's fingerpad. When gratings of alternating grooves and ridges were moved sinusoidally back and forth across the receptive field, the responses of the afferent were often not equal for the 2 directions of movement. To investigate this phenomenon, the position of the center of the afferent's receptive field, relative to the contact area between the grating and the finger, was varied systematically. For some afferents, regardless of these relative positions, the response was always greater for a particular direction of movement. For other afferents, regardless of these relative positions, the responses for the 2 directions of movement were always equal. For a minority of afferents, the response was greater for movement in one particular direction for some relative positions and greater for movement in the opposite direction for other relative positions. Slowly adapting afferents (SAs), rapidly adapting afferents (RAs), and Pacinian afferents (PCs) exhibited all 3 types of response patterns. We could not relate these patterns to the afferent type or to the positions, in the fingerpad, of the receptive field center. The contact force between the grating and the finger was varied by varying the contact displacement (indentation). Two grating spatial periods were used. For SAs and PCs the response increased with increasing indentation for both gratings. For RAs the response to the finer grating increased with increasing indentation, but the response to the coarser grating did not.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Bensmaia, J. C. Craig, T. Yoshioka, and K. O. Johnson SA1 and RA Afferent Responses to Static and Vibrating Gratings J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1771 - 1782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Birznieks, P. Jenmalm, A. W. Goodwin, and R. S. Johansson Encoding of Direction of Fingertip Forces by Human Tactile Afferents J. Neurosci., October 15, 2001; 21(20): 8222 - 8237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Jenmalm and R. S. Johansson Visual and Somatosensory Information about Object Shape Control Manipulative Fingertip Forces J. Neurosci., June 1, 1997; 17(11): 4486 - 4499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help