Wahl et al. (2007) suggested in their Discussion that the diffusion-tensor- (DT-) based fractional anisotropy (FA) in the corpus callosum (CC)
“reflects primarily fiber density rather than the degree of myelination or
axon diameter” (Wahl et al., 2007; page 12137). To the best of our
knowledge, this suggestion contradicts previous histology and DT-MRI
reports that failed to demonstrate such association (Pierpaoli et al,
1996; Beaulieu, 2002). The study by Wahl et al. (2007) did not provide
histology or callosal “functional activation” area measurements. They did
not report transverse nor axial eigenvalues that would have provided a
more specific surrogate of axonal packing and myelination (Drobyshevsky et
al., 2005). The suggested hypothesis may explain qualitatively the
observation: FA(genu CC) > FA(body CC), but it may not explain the
trend that has been documented (see Hasan et al. 2005) by several DTI
studies: FA(splenium CC) > FA(genu CC) > FA(genu CC). Although
scant, published histological studies on both rhesus monkey (La Mantia and
Rakic, 1990) and human CC (Aboitiz et al. 1992) did not report significant
correlations between callosal axonal packing and callosal area that may
be attributable to the fiber diameter, separation, and myelination
distribution regional variability. The association of callosal areas with
the corresponding FA needs some careful validation on controls. A recent
DTI study on healthy adult controls by Westerhausen et al. (2006) reported
that posterior callosal area correlated negatively with diffusion
anisotropy, while Alexander et al. (2007) reported on healthy children a
positive correlation between “corpus callosum volume” and the
corresponding FA mean value. Thus, conclusive data from both MRI and
histology in regards to the relations between the CC micro and
macrostructure on and their interplay with function and behavior remain
elusive even on the simplest of all brain structures.
References
Aboitiz F, Scheibel AB, Fisher RS, Zaidel E (1992) Fiber composition
of the human corpus callosum. Brain Res 598:143–153.
Alexander AL, Lee JE, Lazar M, Boudos R, DuBray MB, Oakes TR, Miller
JN, Lu J, Jeong EK, McMahon WM, Bigler ED, Lainhart JE (2007) Diffusion
tensor imaging of the corpus callosum in Autism. Neuroimage 34:61-73.
La Mantia AS, Rakic P (1990) Cytological and quantitative
characteristics of four cerebral commissures in the rhesus monkey. J Comp
Neurol 291;520-537.
Beaulieu C (2002) The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the
nervous system - a technical review.NMR Biomed 15:435-55. Review.
Drobyshevsky A, Song SK, Gamkrelidze G, Wyrwicz AM, Derrick M, Meng
F, Li L, Ji X, Trommer B, Beardsley DJ, Luo NL, Back SA, Tan S (2005)
Developmental changes in diffusion anisotropy coincide with immature
oligodendrocyte progression and maturation of compound action potential. J
Neurosci 25:5988–5997.
Hasan KM, Gupta RK, Santos RM, Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA (2005)
Diffusion tensor fractional anisotropy of the normal-appearing seven
segments of the corpus callosum in healthy adults and relapsing-remitting
multiple sclerosis patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:735-743.
La Mantia AS, Rakic P (1990) Cytological and quantitative
characteristics of four cerebral commissures in the rhesus monkey. J Comp
Neurol 291;520-537.
Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, Barnett A, Di Chiro G (1996)
Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 201:637-648.
Wahl M, Lauterbach-Soon B, Hattingen E, Jung P, Singer O, Volz S,
Klein JC, Steinmetz H, Ziemann U (2007) Human motor corpus callosum:
topography, somatotopy, and link between microstructure and function. J
Neurosci 27:12132-12138.
Westerhausen R, Kreuder F, Dos Santos Sequeira S, Walter C, Woerner
W, Wittling RA, Schweiger E, Wittling W (2006) The association of macro-
and microstructure of the corpus callosum and language lateralisation.
Brain Lang 97:80-90.