In the interests of fairness I
think it is reasonable to draw attention to the network scheme shown in
Figure 9. No citation is given for the claim that small ipsilateral
inhibitory interneurons receive inputs from excitatory interneurons, a
connection shown in Parker (2003). Given that other connections have
supporting references it seems fair to draw attention to the omission of
this citation.
Also, the crossing inhibitory interneuron input to the excitatory
interneurons, which is repeatedly assumed in network schemes, has never
actually been identified experimentally. This connection should thus be
stippled along with the other hypothetical connections referred to in the
legend to Figure 9. The specific details of the known connectivity in the
segmental network are given in Buchanan (2001) or Parker (2006).
Buchanan J (2001) Contributions of identifiable neurons and neuron
classes to lamprey vertebrate neurobiology. Prog Neurobiol 63:441-466.
Parker D (2003) Activity-Dependent Feedforward Inhibition Modulates
Synaptic Transmission in a Spinal Locomotor Network. J Neurosci 23:11085-
11093.
Parker D (2006) Complexities and uncertainties of neuronal network
function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences 361:81-99.