Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Video Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Permissions
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Video Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Permissions
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Dual Gamma Rhythm Generators Control Interlaminar Synchrony in Auditory Cortex

Matthew Ainsworth, Shane Lee, Mark O. Cunningham, Anita K. Roopun, Roger D. Traub, Nancy J. Kopell and Miles A. Whittington
Journal of Neuroscience 23 November 2011, 31 (47) 17040-17051; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2209-11.2011
Matthew Ainsworth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shane Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark O. Cunningham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita K. Roopun
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger D. Traub
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nancy J. Kopell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miles A. Whittington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Increasing excitation to A1 induced lamina-specific frequency bifurcation of population gamma rhythms. Ai, Mean modal peak gamma rhythm power in population recordings from layer 4. As gamma power increases from 200 to 600 nm, kainate frequency also increases. With kainate concentrations beyond 600 nm, dual modal peaks are seen in the power spectra. Data shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6 slices from 6 rats). Aii, Example pooled power spectra on either side of the bifurcation point (n = 6 slices from 6 rats) and corresponding single examples of population potentials below. Calibration: 200 μV, 100 ms. B, Laminar profile of peak gamma power in A1. Data shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6 slices from 6 rats) for gamma generated by 800 nm kainate at peak frequencies of 30–45 Hz (gray lines and symbols) and 50–80 Hz (black lines and symbols). C, Power spectral density [mean (n = 5 slices from 5 rats) plotted as color map, in decibels] versus lamina and frequency within A1 before (400 nm kainate) and after (800 nm kainate) frequency bifurcation. Data shown taken from 1 × 10 linear array electrodes. Similar data were also obtained using parallel shanks on Utah probes but with lower spatial resolution.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Pharmacological manipulation reveals different mechanisms underlying the slow and fast gamma rhythms. A, Proportional change in mean (n = 5 slices from 5 rats) gamma power for slow, layer 2/3 gamma (30–45 Hz, gray bars) and fast, layer 4 gamma (50–80 Hz, black bars), induced by 800 nm kainate. Both rhythms were equally sensitive to GABAA receptor blockade (gabazine, 1 μm). Layer 4, high gamma was significantly less sensitive to AMPA receptor blockade (SYM2206, 10 μm) and nonspecific gap junction conductance decrease [carbenoxolone (cbx), 0.2 mm[rsqb]. Layer 2/3, slow gamma was insensitive to NR2C/D-containing NMDAR blockade (PPDA, 10 μm), whereas this manipulation almost abolished layer 4, fast gamma. Asterisks indicate significantly different effects of each drug on the two gamma rhythms (p < 0.05, n = 5 slices from 5 rats). B, Example pooled power spectra (n = 5 slices from 5 rats) for layer 4 population responses to 800 nm kainate showing the differential effects of PPDA (left graph) and carbenoxolone (right graph).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Lamina-specific interneuron input/output behavior before and after frequency bifurcation. A, Example layer 2/3 FS interneuron recordings during exposure to 400 nm kainate (low gamma only) and 800 nm kainate (low and high gamma). Top traces show behavior at resting membrane potential (RMP) in each condition (−55 mV, low gamma only; −53 mV, low and high gamma). Bottom traces show EPSP inputs recorded from −70 mV in each case. Note the maintenance of low gamma frequency spike generation despite the addition of faster, smaller EPSPs in the low and high gamma condition. B, Example recordings from a layer 4 FS interneuron during 400 and 800 nm kainate application, RMPs of −57 and −52 mV, respectively. Bottom traces show EPSP inputs at −70 mV. Note the paucity of spike generation and EPSP inputs in the low gamma condition is transformed into spiking at high gamma frequencies, with high gamma frequency EPSP inputs in 800 nm kainate. C, Example recordings from layer 5 FS interneurons in the two conditions. RMPs were −56 and −54 mV. Note spike rates switch from low to high gamma frequency corresponding to an increase in rate of EPSPs from low to high gamma frequency. Calibration: 100 ms, 40 mV (RMP), 10 mV (EPSP).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Lamina-specific principal cell input/output behavior before and after frequency bifurcation. A, Example layer 2/3 regular spiking pyramidal cell recordings during exposure to 400 nm kainate (low gamma only) and 800 nm kainate (low and high gamma). Top traces show behavior at RMP in each condition (−63 mV, low gamma only; −66 mV, low and high gamma). Bottom traces show IPSP inputs recorded from −30 mV in each case. Note the maintenance of very sparse spike generation despite the addition of faster, smaller IPSPs in the low and high gamma condition. B, Example recordings from a layer 4 accommodating principal cell during 400 and 800 nm kainate application, with RMPs of −64 and −57 mV, respectively. Bottom traces show IPSP inputs at −70 mV. Note the paucity of spike generation accompanying low gamma frequency, relatively broad IPSPs in the low gamma condition is transformed into near 1:1 spiking on each period of the high gamma local field potential. Note also the marked increase in mean IPSP amplitude in 800 nm kainate. C, Example recordings from a layer 5 intrinsically bursting pyramidal cell in the two conditions. RMPs were −67 and −63 mV. Note that spike rates switch from sparse, with bursts, to a missed-beat pattern during 800 nm kainate. Note also the increase in rate of IPSPs in this cell type. Calibration: 100 ms, 30 mV (RMP), 8 mV (IPSP).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Higher gamma frequencies associate with faster pyramidal neuron IPSPs in layers 4 and 5 but not layer 2/3. Graph shows mean decay constants (single-exponential fit) for IPSPs (average of 50 IPSPs per principal cell subtype averaged over n = 5 cells from 5 slices in each case) recorded from principal cells in each layer held at −30 mV by depolarizing current injection. Black bars show data in the presence of 400 nm kainate (low-frequency gamma only). Gray bars show data in the presence of 800 nm kainate (low- and higher-frequency gamma rhythms coexpressed). *p < 0.05. Right shows example mean IPSPs from single neurons (IPSP amplitude maximum-referenced average of 50 events in each case). Black traces are taken in the presence of 400 nm kainate, gray traces in 800 nm. Calibration: 20 ms.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Computational model demonstrates laminar-specific frequency sensitivity with change in drive. A, Behavior of the model network in conditions mimicking low glutamatergic excitation (400 nm kainate). The model robustly reproduces the core features of the experimental data: a low-frequency gamma rhythm in layers 2/3 projected to layers 4 and 5; sparse spiking in principal cells; only interneuron recruitment in layers 2/3 and 5, abolished by uncoupling layers (right) (compare Figs. 3, 4). B, Elevated tonic drive to layer 4 principal cells generates a faster rhythm in the model granular layer accompanied by local, intense principal cell spiking. Note that the lower-frequency, layer 2/3 rhythm persists in the presence of this faster rhythm but at marginally lower power, but the layer 5 rhythm switches to the layer 4 input frequency. Each of these two effects is abolished with removal of interlaminar connections. Note the separate calibration bar (in red, right of PSD graphs) for power spectra from layer 4. Ci, Diagram showing the structure of the model (for details, see Materials and Methods). Cii, The frequency bifurcation is enhanced by interlaminar interactions. Model predicts the reduction in frequency seen at 800 nm kainate is in part generated by ascending inhibition onto superficial interneurons (Ig–Is removed, gray spectrum). Ciii, Model shows that effects of PPDA can be attributed to reduction in Eg–Eg recurrent excitation alone. Figure shows simulated field potentials from layer 4 in the presence (black) and absence (gray) of Eg–Eg with NMDAR-like kinetics. Calibration: 0.2 V, 100 ms. LFP, Local field potential.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Layers 4 and 5 but not layer 2/3 principal cells phase lock to the faster gamma rhythm. A, Graphs showing mean (n = 5 cells from 5 slices each from a separate rat) spike probability for layer 2/3 (top), layer 4 (middle), and layer 5 (bottom) principal cells. Data are plotted as probability of observing a spike on any given gamma period relative to local field potential phase in 1 ms bins, with 0 ms being the peak negativity in the field on each period. Data are overlaid from the two kainate (KA) concentrations: 400 nm generating only the lower gamma frequency (gray line) and 800 nm generating both fast and slow gamma rhythms concurrently (black line). Mean example traces below show 100 ms epochs of local field potential averaged to each spike in the corresponding intracellular recording. Note the different probability values on the axes for each of the three principal cell types. B, Period-by-period analysis of the relationship between instantaneous layer 4 local field potential frequency and corresponding layer 4 principal cell spiking. Data are pooled for both 400 and 800 nm kainate conditions. Note the near 1:1 relationship between layer 4 principal cell spike rate and field potential frequency for gamma frequencies over ∼45 Hz.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    The generation of the higher gamma frequency rhythm in layer 4 switches interlaminar synchrony relative to the layer 5 local field potential. A, Plots of field potential cross-correlation values (as color map) against phase and layer. Reference in each case was mid-layer 5 electrode. Note the contrasting interlaminar interactions in the presence of a single low gamma rhythm (400 nm kainate, left) and high and low gamma rhythms (800 nm kainate, right). B, Plot of mean, maximal synchrony within a ±5-ms-wide bin centered around 0 ms from cross-correlations with layer 5 as reference. Note that layer 5 synchronizes preferentially with layer 2/3 in the low gamma condition (400 nm kainate, gray line) but layer 4 in the high and low gamma condition (800 nm kainate, black line).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Values of connection fraction parameters ρj,k

    Eg(j)Ig(k)Es(k)Is(k)Ei(k)Ii(k)
    Eg(j)110.20011
    Ig(j)100.20100
    Es(j)000110.2
    Is(j)0.2001000
    Ei(j)000001
    Ii(j)000010
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Values of synaptic conductance parameters gj,k

    Eg(k)Ig(k)Es(k)Is(k)Ei(k)Ii(k)
    Eg(j)0.0550.390.0100.070.2
    Ig(j)0.60000.700
    Es(j)0005.00.11.7
    Is(j)0.2501.0000
    Ei(j)000001
    Ii(j)00000.10
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 31 (47)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 31, Issue 47
23 Nov 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dual Gamma Rhythm Generators Control Interlaminar Synchrony in Auditory Cortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Dual Gamma Rhythm Generators Control Interlaminar Synchrony in Auditory Cortex
Matthew Ainsworth, Shane Lee, Mark O. Cunningham, Anita K. Roopun, Roger D. Traub, Nancy J. Kopell, Miles A. Whittington
Journal of Neuroscience 23 November 2011, 31 (47) 17040-17051; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2209-11.2011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article

Share
Dual Gamma Rhythm Generators Control Interlaminar Synchrony in Auditory Cortex
Matthew Ainsworth, Shane Lee, Mark O. Cunningham, Anita K. Roopun, Roger D. Traub, Nancy J. Kopell, Miles A. Whittington
Journal of Neuroscience 23 November 2011, 31 (47) 17040-17051; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2209-11.2011
Permalink:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more 3

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more 3
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Video Archive
  • Collections

For Authors

  • Information for Authors

About

  • Overview
  • Editorial Board
  • Subscriptions
  • For the Media
  • Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2017 by the Society for Neuroscience.

JNeurosci   Print ISSN: 0270-6474   Online ISSN: 1529-2401