Block decoding accuracy all trials, shams (Fig. 4) | CINs | 3.0 ± 1.1 | 2.4 ± 1.0 | 2.1 ± 0.4 |
| MSNs | 1.4 ± 0.7 | 1.8 ± 1.0 | 1.4 ± 0.5 |
Accuracy on suboptimal choices, shams (Fig. 5a) | CINs | −10.6 ± 4.1 | −7.3 ± 2.7 | −5.4 ± 3.9 |
| MSNs | 1.6 ± 1.2 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 1.9 ± 2.8 |
Miscoding on suboptimal choices, shams (Fig. 5b) | CINs | 11.2 ± 8.2 | 17.3 ± 10.0 | 9.5 ± 4.8 |
| MSNs | −0.2 ± 3.1 | 2.5 ± 5.3 | −1.3 ± 2.9 |
Accuracy on optimal choices, shams (Fig. 6a) | CINs | 3.2 ± 3.3 | 1.5 ± 3.3 | 0.8 ± 2.7 |
| MSNs | 1.0 ± 5.1 | 2.2 ± 1.8 | 2.2 ± 1.8 |
Miscoding on optimal choices, shams (Fig. 6b) | CINs | −3.0 ± 1.7 | −1.9 ± 0.8 | −1.7 ± 2.3 |
| MSNs | −1.2 ± 3.2 | −2.1 ± 2.0 | −1.8 ± 2.9 |
% Yoked, suboptimal trials (Fig. 7a) | MSNs | −0.2 ± 1.9 | 24.7 ± 6.9 | −3.3 ± 1.9 |
Accuracy of yoked MSNs, suboptimal trials (Fig. 7b) | MSNs | 3.1 ± 1.5 | −11.9 ± 0.8 | −5.9 ± 1.6 |
% Yoked, optimal trials (Fig. 7c) | MSNs | 4.0 ± 2.8 | 2.9 ± 2.2 | 2.1 ± 2.4 |
Accuracy of yoked MSNs, optimal trials (Fig. 7d) | MSNs | 6.3 ± 1.8 | 7.5 ± 2.3 | 8.6 ± 1.6 |
Choice-direction decoding accuracy, shams (Fig. 8) | CINs | 11.8 ± 0.57 | 16.0 ± 5.2 | 13.0 ± 2.0 |
| MSNs | 5.8 ± 1.7 | 11.6 ± 3.3 | 7.6 ± 2.5 |
Block decoding accuracy all trials, OFC lesions (Fig. 10) | CINs | 0.3 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 2.0 | 0.4 ± 0.4 |
Accuracy on suboptimal choices, OFC lesions (Fig. 12a) | CINs | −1.2 ± 3.0 | 0.14 ± 1.1 | 2.5 ± 2.7 |
Miscoding on suboptimal choices, OFC lesions (Fig. 12b) | CINs | −4.8 ± 2.0 | 0.1 ± 2.8 | −1.0 ± 3.5 |
Choice-direction decoding accuracy, OFC lesions (Fig. 12d) | CINs | 7.6 ± 2.8 | 14.6 ± 2.4 | 5.7 ± 2.8 |