Elsevier

Animal Behaviour

Volume 53, Issue 6, June 1997, Pages 1129-1142
Animal Behaviour

Regular Article
Starlings’ preferences for predictable and unpredictable delays to food

https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0388Get rights and content

Abstract

Risk-sensitive foraging theory is based on the premise that unpredictable runs of good or bad luck can cause a variable food source to differ in fitness value from a fixed food source yielding the same average rate of gain but no unpredictability. Thus, risk-sensitive predictions are dependent on the food intake from variable sources being not only variable but also unpredictable or ‘risky’ in outcome. This study tested whether unpredictability is a component of the value that foraging starlings,Sturnus vulgarisattribute to food sources that are variable in the delay to obtain food. Two groups of birds chose between a fixed and a variable delay option; the variable option was unpredictable in the risky group and predictable in the risk-free group in the overall rate of intake it yielded. In both groups the fixed option was adjusted by titration to quantify the magnitude of preference for predictable and unpredictable variance. On negative energy budgets both groups were significantly risk-prone, with the risky group being significantly more risk-prone than the risk-free group. Switching the birds to positive budgets by doubling the size of each food reward had no significant effect on preference, and similar trends to those found with negative budgets were observed. These results are not readily explained by risk-sensitive foraging theory, but may be explained by the algorithm used by the birds to attribute value to average expected rewards.

References (24)

  • M Bateson et al.

    Preferences for fixed and variable food sources: variability in amount and delay

    J. exp. Analysis Behav

    (1995)
  • M Bateson et al.

    Rate currencies and the foraging starling: the fallacy of the averages revisited

    Behav. Ecol

    (1996)
  • Cited by (85)

    • Some theoretical notes on spatial discounting

      2021, Behavioural Processes
      Citation Excerpt :

      Research in psychophysics has documented a variety of deficits and factors which affect individuals’ ability to correctly estimate perceived or remembered distances (Bradley and Vido, 1984; Da Silva, 1985; Higashiyama and Shimono, 1994; Montello, 1997) as well as interobject distances (Levin and Haber, 1993; Matsushima et al., 2005). Variability in distance (and thus delay) is a real-world consideration and this extension has previously been explored in the classical delay-discounting literature (Mazur, 1984; McNamara and Houston, 1987; Reboreda and Kacelnik, 1991; Kacelnik and Bateson, 1997). More generally, we have assumed that all the other factors affecting value are known (including rewards sizes, energetic usage, efficiency of travel speeds, and the rate parameters of reward disappearance and threat encounters).

    • Age, but Not Sex, Modulates Foxp3 Expression in the Rat Brain across Development

      2020, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Subsequently, weanling pups become nutritionally and behaviorally independent from their mother and show marked behavioral transformations (Cramer et al., 1990; Thiels et al., 1990). Therefore, it is not shocking the developmental impact of weaning has such a large influence on the maturation of the brain and behavior (Smith, 1991; Bateson and Kacelnik, 1997; Nakamura et al., 2003; Bock et al., 2008). Thus, we speculate that maintaining a relatively brain region independent expression of Foxp3 may allow the neuroimmune system to remain plastic and responsive for the refinement of the nervous system.

    • How unpredictable access to food increases the body fat of small passerines: A mechanistic approach

      2017, Behavioural Processes
      Citation Excerpt :

      For this reason, animals typically prefer an unpredictable (variable) delay, which may allow a quicker delivery of food, to a predictable (fixed) delay equivalent to its mean (Kacelnik and Bateson, 1996). Bateson and Kacelnik (1997) manipulated reward distribution and showed that the propensity of food-deprived starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) to choose a variable-delay option as opposed to a fixed-delay option is higher when variability is unpredictable (3-3-18-3-18-18-… s) than when variability is predictable (3-18-3-18-3-… s). This result confirms the “sooner is better” hypothesis.

    • Does reward unpredictability reflect risk?

      2015, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      If a gambler has enough money to buy all the lottery tickets, he will be able to win the top prize with certainty, even though the outcome is subject to pure hazard. Similarly, the long-term energy requirements allowing animals with a large body size, for example, hippopotami and elephants, to stay alive during a prolonged absence of food may reduce foraging risk [10,75], and the ability of salamanders to regenerate a leg and of lizards to re-grow a lost tail following injury may reduce predation risk, at least in the short-term [70]. In contrast, with limited resources, the number of trials necessary to suppress the effects of unpredictability is impossible to achieve and necessarily imperils persistence of those resources.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    L. C. Drickamer

    f1

    Correspondence: M. Bateson, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, U.K. (email: [email protected]).

    View full text