Skip to main content
Log in

Gambling for Gatorade: risk-sensitive decision making for fluid rewards in humans

Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determining how both humans and animals make decisions in risky situations is a central problem in economics, experimental psychology, behavioral economics, and neurobiology. Typically, humans are risk seeking for gains and risk averse for losses, while animals may display a variety of preferences under risk depending on, amongst other factors, internal state. Such differences in behavior may reflect major cognitive and cultural differences or they may reflect differences in the way risk sensitivity is probed in humans and animals. Notably, in most studies humans make one or a few choices amongst hypothetical or real monetary options, while animals make dozens of repeated choices amongst options offering primary rewards like food or drink. To address this issue, we probed risk-sensitive decision making in human participants using a paradigm modeled on animal studies, in which rewards were either small squirts of Gatorade or small amounts of real money. Possible outcomes and their probabilities were not made explicit in either case. We found that individual patterns of decision making were strikingly similar for both juice and for money, both in overall risk preferences and in trial-to-trial effects of reward outcome on choice. Comparison with decisions made by monkeys for juice in a similar task revealed highly similar gambling styles. These results unite known patterns of risk-sensitive decision making in human and nonhuman primates and suggest that factors such as the way a decision is framed or internal state may underlie observed variation in risk preferences between and within species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Barraclough DJ, Conroy ML, Lee D (2004) Prefrontal cortex and decision making in a mixed-strategy game. Nat Neurosci 7:404–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard DH (1997) The Psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brandstätter E, Gigerenzer G, Hertwig R (2006) The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs. Psychol Rev 133:409–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Lakshminarayanan V, Santos L (2006) How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from Capuchin monkey trading behavior. J Polit Econ 114:517–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T (1981) Energy budgets, risk and foraging preferences in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden BY, Platt ML (2007) Temporal discounting predicts risk sensitivity in rhesus macaques. Curr Biol 17:49–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig R, Barron G, Weber EU, Erev I (2004) Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychol Sci 15:534–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huettel SA, Stowe CJ, Gordon EM, Warner BT, Platt ML (2006) Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity. Neuron 49:765–775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kacelnik A, Bateson M (1996) Risky theories—the effects of variance on foraging decisions. Am Zool 36:402–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (2000) Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhberger A, Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Perner J (1999) The Effects of framing, reflection, probability, and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 78:204–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnen CM, Knutson B (2005) The neural basis of financial risk taking. Neuron 47:763–770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy AN, Platt ML (2005) Risk-sensitive neurons in macaque posterior cingulate cortex. Nat Neurosci 8:1220–1227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin H, Raineri A, Cross D (1991) Subjective probability and delay. J Exp Anal Behav 55:233–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin H (2000) The science of self-control. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Reboreda J, Kacelnik A (1991) Risk sensitivity in starlings: variability in food amount and food delay. Behav Ecol 2:301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson PA (1963) Risk and uncertainty: a fallacy of large numbers. Scientia 98:108–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuck-Paim C, Pompilio L, Kacelnik A (2004) State-dependent decisions cause apparent violations of rationality in animal choice. PLos Biol 2:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafir S, Wiegmann DD, Smith BH, Real LA (1999) Risk-sensitive foraging: choice behaviour of honeybees in response to variability in volume of reward. Anim Behav 57:1055–1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugrue LP, Corrado GS, Newsome WT (2004) Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex. Science 304:1782–1787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sugrue LP, Corrado GS, Newsome WT (2005) Choosing the greater of two goods: neural currencies for valuation and decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:363–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement learning: an introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber EU, Shafir S, Blais AR (2004) Predicting risk sensitivity in humans and lower animals: risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psychol Rev 111:430–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Jason-Flor Sisante for helping to set up the human experimental system. We thank Ashley Nutter and Cameron Martin for collecting the data, and the SROP program at Duke for financial support. Experiments were performed in compliance with the laws of the United States.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Y. Hayden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayden, B.Y., Platt, M.L. Gambling for Gatorade: risk-sensitive decision making for fluid rewards in humans. Anim Cogn 12, 201–207 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0186-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0186-8

Keywords

Navigation