PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Paul Szyszka
AU  - Christiane Demmler
AU  - Mariann Oemisch
AU  - Ludwig Sommer
AU  - Stephanie Biergans
AU  - Benjamin Birnbach
AU  - Ana F. Silbering
AU  - C. Giovanni Galizia
TI  - Mind the Gap: Olfactory Trace Conditioning in Honeybees
AID  - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6668-10.2011
DP  - 2011 May 18
TA  - The Journal of Neuroscience
PG  - 7229--7239
VI  - 31
IP  - 20
4099  - http://www.jneurosci.org/content/31/20/7229.short
4100  - http://www.jneurosci.org/content/31/20/7229.full
SO  - J. Neurosci.2011 May 18; 31
AB  - Trace conditioning is a form of classical conditioning, where a neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus, CS) is associated with a following appetitive or aversive stimulus (unconditioned stimulus, US). Unlike classical delay conditioning, in trace conditioning there is a stimulus-free gap between CS and US, and thus a poststimulus neural representation (trace) of the CS is required to bridge the gap until its association with the US. The properties of such stimulus traces are not well understood, nor are their underlying physiological mechanisms. Using behavioral and physiological approaches, we studied appetitive olfactory trace conditioning in honeybees. We found that single-odor presentation created a trace containing information about odor identity. This trace conveyed odor information about the initial stimulus and was robust against interference by other odors. Memory acquisition decreased with increasing CS–US gap length. The maximum learnable CS–US gap length could be extended by previous trace-conditioning experience. Furthermore, acquisition improved when an additional odor was presented during the CS–US gap. Using calcium imaging, we tested whether projection neurons in the primary olfactory brain area, the antennal lobe, contain a CS trace. We found odor-specific persistent responses after stimulus offset. These post-odor responses, however, did not encode the CS trace, and perceived odor quality could be predicted by the initial but not by the post-odor response. Our data suggest that olfactory trace conditioning is a less reflexive form of learning than classical delay conditioning, indicating that odor traces might involve higher-level cognitive processes.