Table 2.

Behavior of wild-type C. elegans (N2), reserpine-treated N2, and two cat-1 mutants

BehaviorN2N2 + reserpinecat-1(e1111)cat-1(n733)
Movement on plates (bends/min)2-a
 On food11.0  ± 1.115.7  ± 1.8*17.7  ± 1.6*15.6  ± 1.9*
 Off food18.5  ± 2.117.9  ± 2.418.7  ± 2.619.0  ± 1.9
Thrashing in liquid (bends/min)2-b217  ± 19ND216  ± 7214  ± 12
Egg laying (No. of eggs in utero)2-c
 14°C14.8  ± 2.213.1  ± 1.615.5  ± 2.515.1  ± 0.6
 20°C15.9  ± 3.225.1  ± 3.8**27.3  ± 2.2**23.8  ± 1.5**
Male mating2-d
 % No progeny30 (17/56)ND90 (46/51)***100 (58/58)***
 % 1–100 progeny13 (7/56)  8 (4/51)    0 (0/58) 
 % >100 progeny57 (32/56) 2 (1/51)    0 (0/58) 
  • ND, Not determined.

  • F2-a Movement on plates was determined for 10 groups of 5 individuals either on food or off food for each genotype, as described in Materials and Methods. Means ± SEMs are given.

  • F2-b Thrashing in liquid was determined for 10 groups of 10 individuals as described in Materials and Methods. Means of the 10 groups ± SEMs are given.

  • F2-c The number of fertilized eggs in utero was counted in groups of 19–63 adult hermaphrodites raised at particular temperatures. Means of four groups ± SEMs are given.

  • F2-d Single males were placed with single “females” as described in Materials and Methods. The percentages of males that produced a given number of progeny are listed with numbers of individuals in parentheses. Mating was also evaluated forcat-1 mutants carrying the amber suppressor sup-5(Waterston and Brenner, 1978). Male progeny of a cross betweensup-5/+ males and cat-1 hermaphrodites (approximately half sup-5/+;cat-1 and half +/+;cat-1) were tested for mating ability. With thecat-1(e1111) amber mutation, there was significantsup-5-dependent rescue of mating: 47% no progeny, 22% 1–100 progeny; 31% > 100 progeny (n = 58; different from cat-1(e1111) alone with p < 0.01, χ2 test). With the cat-1(n733) missense mutation, there was no sup-5-dependent rescue of mating: 0% mated (n = 20).

  • *cat-1(e1111), cat-1(n733), and reserpine-treated N2 were significantly different from N2; p < 0.01 (Student’s t test).

  • **cat-1(e1111), cat-1(n733), and reserpine-treated nematodes were all significantly different from N2 at 20°C; p < 0.01 (Student’s t test).

  • ***cat-1(e1111) and cat-1(n733) were significantly different from N2; p < 0.01 (χ2 test).