Table 3.

Both crossed and uncrossed efferent pathways protect the cochlea from loud sound-induced TTSs in nondamaging noise backgrounds that can exacerbate the sound-induced TTS

Comparison groups/treatments3-aANOVAF and p values (Interaction = group × frequency interaction)t test type3-b and df3-cFrequency range with significant differences3-d and parameters of significance
A. In ears with non-functional efferent pathways, noise backgrounds exacerbate loud tone-induced TTS, depending on noise intensity
Silence 3 OC−Noise 1 OC−Group F= 0.33; p = 0.59
(noise = 40 dB SPL)InteractionF = 0.74; p = 0.76
Silence 3 OC−Noise 2 OC−Group F = 131, p < 0.001Two-tail, df = 912, 13, 16–28 kHz; t always > 2.5; p generally < 0.005
(noise = 60 dB SPL)Interaction F = 8.02; p < 0.001
Silence 3 OC−Noise 3 OC−Group F = 22.69; p < 0.001Two-tail, df = 812, 13, 16–28 kHz;t always > 2.5; p generally < 0.01
(noise = 80 dB SPL)Interaction F = 4.92;p < 0.001
Noise 1 OC−Noise 2 OC−GroupF = 104.3; p < 0.001One-tail, df = 813, 16–28 kHz; t always > 2.3; p generally < 0.005
(noise = 40 dB SPL)(noise = 60 dB SPL)InteractionF = 4.37; p < 0.001
Noise 2 OC−Noise 3 OC−Group F = 5.91; p < 0.05One-tail, df = 1110, 22–28 kHz; t always > 1.9; p < 0.05
(noise = 60 dB SPL)(noise = 80 dB SPL)Interaction F = 1.73; p < 0.05
B. In efferent-intact ears, noise backgrounds do not exacerbate the TTS caused by a loud tone
Silence 3 OC+Noise 1 OC+Group F = 0.33; p = 0.59
(noise = 40 dB SPL)Interaction F = 0.74; p = 0.74
Silence 3 OC+Noise 2 OC+Group F = 1.297;p = 0.28
(noise = 60 dB SPL)InteractionF = 0.99; p = 0.47
Silence 3 OC+Noise 3 OC+Group F = 0.49; p = 0.5
(noise = 80 dB SPL)Interaction F = 0.403; p = 0.4
C. The cochlear protection from loud sound-induced TTS in noise backgrounds is attributable to both crossed and uncrossed efferent pathways
Noise 4 (COC−)Noise 3 OC−Group F = 34.22; p < 0.001One-tail, df = 149–28 kHz;t always > 2.04; p generally < 0.005
(noise = 80 dB SPL)(noise = 80 dB SPL)Interaction F = 8.1;p < 0.001
Noise 4 (COC−)Noise 3 OC+Group F = 7.02; p < 0.02One-tail df = 1212–18 kHz; t always > 2.1; p always < 0.05
(noise = 80 dB SPL)(noise = 80 dB SPL)InteractionF = 2.08; p < 0.01
Noise 5 COC−Noise 5 OC+Group F = 1093; p < 0.001One-tail, df = 49–28 kHz; t always > 2.7;p generally < 0.0005
(noise = 80 dB SPL)(noise = 80 dB SPL)Interaction F = 25.44; p < 0.001
  • F3-a All Noise groups were tested binaurally with the loud tone in a noise background. OC+ = all olivocochlear efferent pathways were intact to that group/treatment ears, OC− = all efferent pathways were lesioned, and COC− = only the crossed efferent pathways lesioned (leaving uncrossed efferent pathways intact).

  • F3-b t tests were performed when the ANOVA indicated significant differences.

  • F3-c Degrees of freedom.

  • F3-d Frequencies for which tvalues were significant at α = 0.05 (i.e., p at least < 0.05).