Table 1.

Response properties of neurons in the IC1-a

LocationExperienceLesion1-bnp1-cns1-dResponse latency1-e (msec)Frequency tuning width1-f (kHz)Best frequency progression1-g (kHz/mm)Best ILD progression1-h (dB/mm)
ICXNormalYes487.8  ± 1.22.5  ± 0.60.3  ± 1.8−12.3  ± 9.7
No8197.8  ± 1.82.9  ± 0.71.3  ± 2.7−20.3  ± 9.1
Device-rearedYes16258.9  ± 2.82.8  ± 0.93.3  ± 2.8−10.0  ± 20.3
No22438.7  ± 4.33.2  ± 0.66.4  ± 4.2−16.7  ± 19.3
Combined data:50958.5  ± 3.53.0  ± 0.83.2  ± 3.8−16.3  ± 16.4
ICCIsNormalYes5125.8  ± 1.41.4  ± 0.35.9  ± 3.26.7  ± 22.0
No291456.1  ± 1.31.5  ± 0.64.4  ± 3.14.9  ± 36.9
Device-rearedYes12155.6  ± 1.31.4  ± 0.33.7  ± 1.5−3.2  ± 19.9
No1163865.7  ± 1.21.3  ± 0.44.3  ± 2.92.5  ± 26.2
Combined data:1625585.8  ± 1.2*1.4  ± 0.5*4.3  ± 2.92.8  ± 28.0*
  • F1-a Values are mean ± SD.

  • F1-b Whether or not the sites' locations were verified using reconstruction of electrolytic lesions.

  • F1-c Number of penetrations.

  • F1-d Number of sites.

  • F1-e Measured using a broadband (3–12 kHz) stimulus.

  • F1-f Includes combined widths when curves had multiple peaks (see Fig. 9).

  • F1-g The difference between best frequencies at adjacent sites along a dorsoventral electrode penetration divided by the distance between them. Progression of best frequency with depth was not significant in the ICX of normal owls (one-sample t test, p = 0.16) but was significant in the ICX of device-reared owls and in the ICCIs of both normal and device-reared owls (p < 0.001).

  • F1-h The difference between best ILDs at adjacent sites along a dorsoventral electrode penetration divided by the distance between them.

  • *ICCIs and ICX totals differed significantly (unpaired t test, p < 0.01).