Table 1.

Statistical summary

ANOVAsTukeypost hoc
EffectsDFFpGroupsp
Figure2Tx1,236.4420.0061 versus 20.004
Time3,6934.764<0.0011 versus 30.384
Time × tx6,690.4440.7782 versus 30.049
Figure3Tx1,200.7400.400
Time3,600.9440.393n/a*
Time × tx3,600.1430.854
Figure4Tx3,321.1390.348
Time3,966.0400.004n/a*
Time × tx9,961.4130.224
Figure5a1 versus 20.016
1 versus 30.006
Tx3,246.6140.0021 versus 40.967
Time3,720.0630.9512 versus 30.833
Time × tx9,721.1600.9412 versus 40.133
3 versus 40.045
Figure5bTx2,207.6260.0031 versus 20.003
Time3,609.781<0.0011 versus 30.642
Time × tx6,601.0840.3792 versus 30.021
Figure 5cTx2,1931.321<0.0011 versus 2<0.001
Time3,570.2290.7321 versus 3<0.001
Time × tx6,570.5710.6382 versus 30.959
Figure 6(DA)Tx1,120.4860.499
Time5,603.3790.040n/a*
Time × tx5,603.1330.050
Figure 6(JOR)Tx1,70.0180.896
Time5,351.5280.249n/a*
Time × tx5,350.0950.192
Figure 7(DA)Tx1,916.5120.003
Time5,452.1950.161n/a*
Time × tx5,452.3440.147
Figure 7(JOR)Tx1,942.717<0.001
Time5,450.9000.431n/a*
Time × tx5,450.4020.693
  • The discussion and conclusions of this study are based primarily on the main effect of treatment (Tx) and the Tukey post hocanalyses shown in the extreme right column; however, the main effect of time (Time) and the time × treatment interaction (Time × tx) are shown for completeness. The identity of the groups in thepost hoc column is indicated by the numbers that are given in each of the respective figures. In some experiments, the JOR was measured in parallel with the collection of microdialysis fractions. Figure 6 (DA) and Figure 7 (DA) show the statistical analyses of dopamine release induced by capsaicin or morphine, respectively (shown in Figs. 6 and 7). Figure 6 (JOR) and Figure 7 (JOR) show the statistical analyses for the JOR measurements taken in parallel with the microdialysis samples; some microdialysis experiments were done without simultaneous JOR measurements. See Figures 2 and 3 for the effect of morphine or capsaicin, respectively, on the JOR in morphine naı̈ve and tolerant rats.

  • *Post hoc analyses were not done because there were only two groups or because there was no significant main effect of treatment (i.e., Fig. 4).