Table 1.

Ubiquitous expression of APP, BACE, and DPsn as a model system to identify genetic modifiers and validate pharmacologically active agents

Actin-GAL4> Ratio of flies expected Ratio of flies scored Wing phenotype
(1) UAS-DPsn/+ 1:4 (0.25) 1:4 (0.25) Wild type
(2) UAS-BACE/UAS-DPsn 1:4 (0.25) 1:4 (0.25) Wild type
(3) UAS-APP;UAS-BACE/+ 1:4 (0.25) 1:40 (0.025) Ectopic veins (75%)
(4) UAS-APP;UAS-BACE/UAS-DPsn 1:4 (0.25) 1:97 (0.01) Ectopic veins (100%)
(5) UAS-APP;UAS-BACE, psnC4/+ 1:4 (0.25) 1:13 (0.077) Weak ectopic veins (70%)
(6) UAS-APP 1:4 (0.25) 1:127 (0.008) Wild type
(7) UAS-APPL1;UAS-DPsn/+ 1:4 (0.25) 1:4 (0.25) Wild type
Nonsupplemented Vehicle supplemented Inhibitor supplemented Wing phenotype Treatment
(8) UAS-APP;UAS-BACE523/UAS-DPsn 1:17 (0.06) 1:18 (0.06) 1:6 (0.17) Weak ectopic veins (100%) 10 nM BACE inhibitor
(9) UAS-APP;UAS-BACE406/UAS-DPsn 1:100 (0.01) 1:97 (0.01) 1:22 (0.045) Ectopic veins (100%) 100 nM γ-secretase inhibitor
(10) UAS-DPsn/+ 1:2.6 (0.38) 1:3 (0.33) 1:2.7 (0.37) No ectopic veins 10 nM BACE or 100 nM γ-secretase inhibitor
  • Ratios of flies expressing the indicated transgenes under the control of the actin-GAL4 driver to nonexpressing flies. A comparison of expected and scored ratios indicates increased lethality during development of the fly. Lethality rate and wing phenotypes of transgenic flies (lines 1-7) and of transgenic larvae raised on nonsupplemented and vehicle supplemented versus BACE- or γ-secretase inhibitor supplemented medium (lines 8-10) are shown.