Table 2.

Resting membrane potential and input resistance of astrocytes in situ under control conditions and after adding Ba2+

AgeResting potential (mV)Input resistance (MΩ)
P9, control−71.9 ± 3.4 (n = 10)38.7 ± 17.0 (n = 10)
P9, 100 μm Cbx−71.9 ± 1.6 (n = 6)44.2 ± 17.5 (n = 6)
P9, 100 μm Cbx, 100 μm BaCl2−61.0 ± 4.1a (n = 6)93.3 ± 49.8a (n = 6)
P9, Kir4.1−/−−39.1 ± 9.8b (n = 9)143.0 ± 82.4b (n = 9)
P9, Kir4.1−/−, 100 μm BaCl2−38.3 ± 10.1 (n = 9)140.5 ± 54.3 (n = 9)
  • Data were obtained from hGFAF/EGFP mice and from Kir4.1−/− mice crossed with hGFAP/EGFP mice. Cell numbers are given in parentheses.

  • aIn the presence of Cbx (100 μm; 30 min preincubation), Ba2+ significantly affected resting potential and input resistance.

  • bIn addition, resting potential and input resistance of astrocytes in control versus Kir4.1−/− mice differed significantly.