Table 2.

Differential cerebellar responses to unpleasant and neutral images by contrast analysis: IAPS, Unpls>Neu (z > 1.05)

Cluster	Max ROI	MNI (z_max)			Max z-stat	Vol (cm³)	Composition
Cluster	Max ROI	x	y	z	Max z-stat	Vol (cm³)	Composition
Cerebellum
1	R VI	39	−51	−26	2.79	3.61	48% R VI; 45% R CrI
2	V IX	1	−57	−38	2.19	12.80	25% L CrII; 14% L CrI; 12% L VIIb;
							6% Vermis VI; 5% V IX; 5%L IX;
							4% L VI; 4% R IX; 4% Vermis VIIIa;
							4% R CrI; 3% R VI; 3% Vermis CrII;
							2% Vermis VIIIb
3	L CrI	−34	−66	−29	1.67	0.60	86% L CrI; 13% L VI
4	L CrI	−36	−55	−31	1.64	0.92	64% L VI; 36% L CrI
5	L CrI	−38	−80	−29	1.59	0.44	93% L CrI
6	R VIIIb	17	−61	−56	1.41	0.41	56% R VIIIb; 44% R VIIIa
Brainstem
1	Mid	2	−28	−4	1.75	0.53
		−2	−18	−4	1.56	1.33
		7	−30	−13	1.55	0.39
		−10	−28	−12	1.53	0.41
	D Med	−5	−36	−31	1.53	0.46

Thresholds were determined using Gaussian mixture modeling (Pendse et al., 2009). Cerebellar regions were identified using the SUIT probabilistic atlas of the human cerebellum (Diedrichsen et al., 2009). Minimum 7 voxels in acquired space (0.30 cm³). L, Left; R, right; CrI, Crus I; CrII, Crus II; D Med, dorsal medulla; Mid, midbrain.