Table 1.

Participant demographics and details of damage to the two tracts of interest

PatientSexAgeAF damage (%)EmC damage (%)
1M7614.011.7
2M593.112.6
3M6347.067.4
4M6716.70.0
5M6333.577.0
6M4111.80.0
7F345.60.0
8F7042.90.0
9M345.236.8
10M700.00.0
11M5576.290.4
12M7292.993.8
13F5311.524.7
14M4688.292.1
15M6410.50.0
16F5644.434.6
17F3638.251.1
18F6461.164.7
19F721.570.3
20F6635.53.4
21F4243.132.8
22F5535.154.7
23F6247.11.9
24M6147.41.3
Mean age57.5
  • The amount of damage to a given tract was calculated as a percentage of a tract that overlapped with a subject's lesion. A value of 100% would indicate that the entire tract overlapped with a lesion. Conversely, a value of 0% indicates relative sparing of that tract.