Table 2.

Pharmacological assessment of IPSCs using TPMPA, NO-711, zolpidem, and clonazepam

Control (n)/Fmr1−/y (n)TPMPA efficacy (mean ± SEM %Δ mIPSC amplitude)NO-711 enhancement (mean ± SEM %)Zolpidem enhancement (mean ± SEM %)Clonazepam enhancement (mean ± SEM %)
P10−13.8 ± 2.1 (5)/−27.4 ± 3.4 (7)2.8 ± 6.1 (9)/5.0 ± 10.6 (4)6.4 ± 9.1 (5)/16.2 ± 2.7 (6)54.8 ± 7.8 (11)/13.8 ± 6.3 (10)
p = 0.012p = 0.911p = 0.230p = 0.0005
P14−14.7 ± 4.4 (5)/−15.7 ± 2.0 (7)ND/ND15.0 ± 4.0 (6)/3.0 ± 0.5 (6)45.2 ± 7.0 (8)/30.5 ± 3.9 (7)
p = 0.834p = 0.100p = 0.102
P16−18.4 ± 3.4 (5)/−22.2 ± 2.8 (5)ND/ND21.6 ± 2.3 (5)/1.0 ± 11.6 (7)34.9 ± 4.2 (5)/43.1 ± 12.0 (8)
p = 0.401p = 0.045p = 0.490
P21−12.2 ± 2.0 (5)/−27.6 ± 4.7 (6)27.9 ± 10.8 (5)/57.5 ± 5.2 (7)50.3 ± 1.7 (8)/11.3 ± 4.5 (8)2.1 ± 4.8 (12)/ 20.6 ± 7.3 (14)
p = 0.018p = 0.022p = 0.027p = 0.048
  • Pharmacological assessment of IPSCs using TPMPA, NO-711, zolpidem, and clonazepam. TPMPA efficacy is defined as the mean ± SEM of the change in mIPSC amplitude in the presence of 100 μm TPMPA. NO-711 enhancement values (defined as the percentage change in decay constant with drug application) are given for control (roman text) and Fmr1−/y (bold text) at each of the ages tested. Zolpidem and clonazepam enhancement values (defined as the percentage change in decay constant with drug application) are given for wild-type (roman text) and Fmr1−/y (bold text) at each of the ages tested. The number of cells in each group is indicated in parentheses. A Student's two-tailed t test was performed for all conditions. The p values are listed below the averaged value, and p < 0.05 are shown in bold. ND, Not determined.