Table 1.

Clinical and demographic characteristics

CharacteristicHCS (n = 106)Baseline SCZ (n = 129)Baseline (with 12 mo followup) SCZ (n = 25)At 12 mo followup SCZ (n = 25)(i) HCS vs SCZ all subjects (baseline) Significance(ii) HCS vs SCZ 12 mo (matched, n = 25) Significance(iii) SCZ (n = 106) vs SCZ (n = 25) at baseline Significance(iv) SCZ baseline vs 12 mo (n = 25) Significance
MSDMSDMSDMSDpT2pT2pT2pT2
Age (y)26.309.4524.297.8823.609.2224.569.220.081.770.900.130.630.49
Sex (% male)484320200.470.720.340.960.012.68*
Education (y)12.473.2712.473.1312.042.7012.042.700.990.010.810.250.450.76
Handedness (% right)100100100100100110
Signal-to-noise (SNR)181.9143.06181.9746.00180.5951.58196.9452.060.990.010.400.850.870.170.181.38
Frames scrubbed (T) (%)5.749.035.889.244.787.835.647.470.90.110.850.190.510.660.720.37
Medication (CPZ equivalents)168.83184.68
Illness duration (mo)12.6221.589.1013.7021.1013.70
GAF scores29.2210.7330.9611.9761.0023.360.370.900.00014.87*
PANSS positive symptoms24.506.6322.445.9412.177.330.081.740.00005.75*
PANSS negative symptoms18.888.3318.565.8312.714.940.830.220.00054.02*
PANSS general psychopathology46.739.6346.448.9229.6311.940.870.170.00006.52*
PANSS thought disturbance13.764.0711.683.126.834.100.002.930.00024.4*
PANSS activation9.193.358.563.205.632.680.291.050.00093.81*
PANSS paranoid10.102.8710.323.095.173.050.670.420.00007.21*
PANSS depression8.713.888.523.486.422.780.790.270.00163.58*
PANSS anergia8.934.448.683.216.632.410.760.310.00153.59*
PANSS impulsive aggression15.935.0415.085.839.174.610.350.940.00014.92*
PANSS total psychopathology95.8819.9994.6816.8658.8824.810.740.330.00006.24*
  • Participants had no current or past alcohol/drug abuse/dependence. The statistical comparisons reflect four different tests that allow interpretation of the demographics for the complete EC-SCZ sample studied at baseline (n = 106) and specifically patients who were followed longitudinally (n = 25 EC-SCZ scanned at baseline and at 12 mo follow-up): (i) comparison of all HCS and EC-SCZ at baseline; (ii) comparison of a subset of matched HCS and those EC-SCZ that received a longitudinal scan (n = 25); (iii) comparison of those EC-SCZ subjects at baseline who did not receive a longitudinal scan (n = 106) versus those who did (n = 25), illustrating comparable profiles (this comparison, however, revealed a difference in gender proportion, but no differences across any other measures, indicating that the subsample followed longitudinally is highly comparable to the complete sample studied at baseline) and (iv) paired t test comparison of EC-SCZ at baseline versus 12 mo follow-up (this analysis revealed a significant improvement across all symptoms for n = 25 patients who received longitudinal follow-up; we specifically quantified this symptom improvement in relation to longitudinally altered PFC rGBC; Fig. 8). CPZ, chlorpromazine; GAF, global assessment of functioning; PANSS, Positive and Negative Symptom Scale.

  • * Significant T or χ2 statistic for the between-group comparison.