Models | AIC | Predictors | t value | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2668 | Consequence | −0.14 | 0.44 |
Intention | 3.73 | 1.01 × 10−3 | ||
Rating 1 | 0.14 | 0.44 | ||
Rating 2 | 7.54 | 8.86 × 10−7 | ||
2 | 2627 | Consequence | −0.68 | 0.51 |
Intention | 3.48 | 3.37 × 10−3 | ||
Rating 1 | 1.27 | 0.22 | ||
Rating 2 | 5.33 | 8.47 × 10−5 | ||
Consequence × intention | −0.53 | 0.60 | ||
3 | 2824 | Consequence | 3.29 | 2.20 × 10−3 |
Intention | 4.75 | 2.60 × 10−4 | ||
Rating 2–rating 1 | 4.24 | 7.20 × 10−4 | ||
4 | 2784 | Consequence | 3.15 | 6.63 × 10−3 |
Intention | 4.50 | 4.21 × 10−4 | ||
Rating 2–rating 1 | 2.30 | 0.04 | ||
Consequence × intention | 0.72 | 0.48 |
The model with the smaller AIC is better. The winning model (model 2) is indicated in bold.