Full model [OR (95% CI)] | |
---|---|
Group (vs HC) | |
NVMF (excluding LOFC cases) | 0.66 (0.45, 0.98)* |
vmPFC/OFC (excluding LOFC cases) | 1.05 (0.74, 1.48) |
Competence rating difference | 1.16 (1.09, 1.24)*** |
NVMF × competence rating difference | 1.04 (0.90, 1.22) |
vmPFC/OFC × competence rating difference | 0.96 (0.84, 1.10) |
Attractiveness rating difference | 1.27 (1.18, 1.37)*** |
NVMF × attractiveness rating difference | 0.94 (0.82, 1.06) |
vmPFC/OFC × attractiveness rating difference | 0.89 (0.77, 1.02)a |
Constant | 0.93 (0.82, 1.06) |
Number of observations | 2 111 |
Competence and attractiveness rating differences were related significantly to candidate choice in HCs. Patients with damage to the vmPFC/OFC sparing the LOFC and patients with damage to other frontal areas sparing the LOFC were as likely as HCs to choose based on perceived competence and attractiveness, as indicated by the lack of interaction between trait rating differences and either patient group status.
↵*p < 0.05,
↵***p < 0.001,
↵ap < 0.1.