Comparison between firing rates of Type-1 and Type-2 PNs as a function of trial type (same analyses as in Figure 5)
| PNs Type 1 | PNs Type 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Prior trial success versus failure | ||
| Waiting | N = 325, p < 0.0001 | N = 31, p = 0.11 |
| ΔFR = 33.1 ± 6.5% | ΔFR = −22.3 ± 17.9% | |
| Foraging | N = 275, p < 0.0001 | N = 33, p = 0.23 |
| ΔFR = 62.4 ± 9.0% | ΔFR = −5.7 ± 10.0% | |
| Foraging versus aborted foraging | N = 186, p < 0.0001 | N = 18, p = 0.001 |
| ΔFR = 83.2 ± 11.6% | ΔFR = −40.9 ± 13.2% | |
| No Robogator versus Robogator | ||
| Waiting | N = 190, p < 0.0001 | N = 15, p = 0.9 |
| ΔFR = 33.2 ± 9.1% | ΔFR = −6.5 ± 12.6% | |
| Foraging | N = 194, p < 0.0001 | N = 15, p = 0.21 |
| ΔFR = 35.4 ± 8.5% | ΔFR = 3.6 ± 9.6% |
FR, firing rate.