Embodiment ratings in the entire sample of 20 participants after application of the median split procedure for sorting low- versus high-embodiment trials in 1PP and 3PP and for accuracy of avatar performance (incorrect vs correct)a
| 1PP | 3PP | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | Low | High | |||||
| Correct | Incorrect | Correct | Incorrect | Correct | Incorrect | Correct | Incorrect | |
| No. of trials | 69 | 172 | 1327 | 428 | 1351 | 590 | 36 | 3 |
| % of trials of total | 4.9 | 28.7 | 95.1 | 71.3 | 97.4 | 99.5 | 2.6 | 0.5 |
| Mean | 1.88 | 1.91 | 3.88 | 3.46 | 1.19 | 1.07 | 3.01 | 3 |
| SD | 0.25 | 0.14 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.30 | 0.10 | 0.02 | — |
| No. of subjects | 8 | 11 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 5 | 1 |
↵aIn 1PP, high embodiment was reported in an overwhelming proportion of trials. In contrast, in 3PP, low embodiment was associated with an overwhelming proportion of trials (see the first four table lines). Line 5 indicates the number of participants (of 20) who contributed to a given category of reports.