Spike | Wild-type mice | STIM1PKO mice | p Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cm (pF) | 644.9 ± 12.7 | 634.5 ± 14.0 | 0.586 | |
Rin (MΩ) | 43.9 ± 1.1 | 38.1 ± 1.0 | <0.001*** | |
First spike latency (ms) | 16.5 ± 0.5 | 18.0 ± 0.9 | 0.137 | |
Rheobase (pA) | 261.1 ± 9.1 | 281.6 ± 11.2 | 0.159 | |
Threshold (mV) | 1st spike | −47.0 ± 0.3 | −46.0 ± 0.5 | 0.080 |
25th spike | −43.1 ± 0.4 | −41.9 ± 0.5 | 0.070 | |
AP amplitude (mV) | 1st spike | 82.0 ± 1.0 | 82.4 ± 1.1 | 0.775 |
25th spike | 70.6 ± 1.0 | 71.4 ± 1.0 | 0.545 | |
FWHM (ms) | 1st spike | 0.205 ± 0.004 | 0.195 ± 0.003 | 0.031* |
25th spike | 0.226 ± 0.005 | 0.211 ± 0.003 | 0.012* | |
Upstroke (V/s) | 1st spike | 542.6 ± 10.1 | 570.1 ± 10.3 | 0.059 |
25th spike | 421.0 ± 9.8 | 448.5 ± 8.8 | 0.039* | |
Downstroke (V/s) | 1st spike | −452.9 ± 10.9 | −466.0 ± 9.6 | 0.368 |
25th spike | −368.8 ± 10.3 | −385.9 ± 9.1 | 0.214 | |
Slope of postspike depolarization (V/s) | 1st spike | 1.69 ± 0.03 | 1.62 ± 0.05 | 0.234 |
25th spike | 1.19 ± 0.03 | 1.01 ± 0.04 | <0.001*** | |
ISI (ms) | 1st spike | 10.4 ± 0.2 | 10.7 ± 0.3 | 0.402 |
25th spike | 14.4 ± 0.3 | 17.3 ± 0.8 | <0.001*** | |
fAHP (mV) | 1st spike | 14.6 ± 0.3 | 14.3 ± 0.4 | 0.581 |
25th spike | 15.8 ± 0.3 | 15.9 ± 0.4 | 0.830 | |
mAHP (mV) | 8.5 ± 0.3 | 10.9 ± 0.3 | <0.001*** |
Several parameters, including Rin, slope of postspike depolarization, ISI, and mAHP were significantly different in STIM1PKO mice compared to wild-type littermates (p < 0.001). Active properties of the 25th spike showed more differences than those of the 1st spike. Slope of postspike depolarization, especially, were remarkably lowered in STIM1PKO mice, which could explain the increase of ISI despite the shortened action potential waveform (p < 0.05). Up-stroke and down-stroke, rising and falling phase of action potential, respectively. Data were from the experiment performed in Figure 5. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
↵*p < 0.05, independent-samples t test.
↵***p < 0.001, independent-samples t test.