Diet–feeding | ZT6 | ZT18 | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
SLD-AL (n = 6) | 5.7 ± 0.6b,c,d,e | 3.0 ± 0.2b,e | p = 0.0015 [7.494 (5, 5)] |
SLD-LP (n = 5) | 2.9 ± 0.5a,c,f | 8.5 ± 0.6a,c,d,f | p = 0.0001 [1.788 (4, 4)] |
SLD-DP (n = 5) | 7.6 ± 0.9a,b,d,e | 2.6 ± 0.2b,e | p = 0. 0005 [19.31 (4, 4)] |
HFD-AL (n = 6) | 3.3 ± 0.2a,c,f | 3.3 ± 0.4b,e | p = 0.97 [2.926 (5, 5)] |
HFD-LP (n = 5) | 2.7 ± 0.4a,c,f | 9.0 ± 1.1a,c,d,f | p = 0.0007 [6.74 (4, 4)] |
HFD-DP (n = 5) | 6.9 ± 0.8b,d,e | 2.4 ± 0.2b,e | p = 0.0005 [16.12 (4, 4)] |
Significance | p < 0.0001 [0.8023 (5, 26)] | p < 0.0001 [1.703 (5, 26)] |
Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Significance between ZT6 and ZT18 within the same diet group was determined using an unpaired t test [F(DFn, Dfd)]. Significance between diet groups at the same time point was determined using a one-way ANOVA [F(DFn, Dfd)] followed by Tukey's post hoc test.
↵ap < 0.05 versus SLD-AL.
↵bp < 0.05 versus SLD-LP.
↵cp < 0.05 versus SLD-DP.
↵dp < 0.05 versus HFD-AL.
↵ep < 0.05 versus HFD-LP.
↵fp < 0.05 versus HFD-DP.